You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Daily Kos sez the Hildebeest is subject to criminal prosecution
2015-03-18
BLUF:
And thus, the worry. SOS Clinton, when she left office, failed to turn over official records of the United States for almost 2 years. We know this because she now has, belatedly, turned over 55,000 pages of records to the State Department. Assume that the failure to turn over the documents was an accident -- doesn't matter, per the regs, she is still subject to criminal prosecution, and 18 USC 641 is broad enough to encompass even accidental retention. Worse still, it was unlawful for her to remove the documents from the state department or to "conceal" them on her server and not turn them over. She could be arrested, forfeit office, and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States....forever.*
Oh the sweet irony: RONALD D. ROTUNDA, WSJ, 16 March 2015 - "Title 18 USC 1519 which includes the deletion or destruction of only one email to block a Federal investigation could be punishable by up to 20 years in Federal Prison. The bar on prosecuting this offense is much less than Title 18 USC 2071 (b) and much easier to Prosecute. This law was enacted in 2002 as part of the Sarbanes -Oxley act dealing with obstruction of Justice in Federal Investigations with then Hillary Clinton supporting this bill in the US Senate."
If Champ really wants to put a stick into Hillary's wheelchair spokes he could do something really simple, completely legal, and totally devious:

pardon her.

It's his right under the Constitution. It would spare her (and the country) all the legal wrangling and it would destroy her presidential campaign, thus opening the door to Fauxcahontas and others. How enjoyable it would be...
It might be instructive to note what we are NOT hearing in the MSM or even at FOX; that being any discussion of late regarding Bill, the Beest's campaign committee, funding, or potential campaign strategy. For this I am thankful
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  How did this all not come out during Benghazi investigations?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-03-18 14:28  

#3  It's salmon, dammit!

And you're right: she would lose her 5th amendment rights for the entire affair. Double-plus good!
Posted by: Steve White   2015-03-18 13:49  

#2  SteveW (you're pinky right?),

That may be the sneakiest, snarkiest idea I've seen in years.

If I understand correctly that would give her total immunity when ordered to testify as there would be no 5th amendment out cause she couldn't incriminate herself. Drag her butt in and make her spill the beans...all the beans.
Posted by: AlanC   2015-03-18 10:20  

#1  Nonsense! She is a Democrat, and more importantly, a CLINTON! Such laws might apply to mere mortals, but not to her. Besides, once she is crowned as Empress, she will simply issue a decree declaring those laws null and void.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2015-03-18 09:46  

00:00