You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
No A-10 Warthog for Afghanistan -- but Here's the Next Best Thing
2015-04-06
For four long years, Afghanistan has been waiting for an air force. Now, they're finally going to get one -- courtesy of the U.S. Air Force.

Given their druthers, the Afghans would probably like an air force geared toward close-air support of their troops combating Taliban fighters on the ground. For that role, the A-10 Warthog is by all accounts the best plane for the job. But beggars can't be choosers. Instead of the A-10, the U.S. Air Force will outfit Afghanistan with 20 brand-new A-29 Super Tucano fighter planes from Embraer.

Wait -- "Tucano"? Like the Froot Loops bird?

A lot like Toucan Sam, yes -- except that Embraer's bird has serious claws. An evolution of Embraer's original Tucano design, the Super Tucano is a prop-driven ground-attack fighter powered by a single 1,600 SHP Pratt & Whitney PT6A-68/3 turboprop engine, and featuring:
An armored cockpit to protect against small-arms and anti-aircraft fire.

Two internal, wing-mounted .50" machine guns for strafing, with magazines of 200 rounds each.

10 additional hardpoints along the wings for attaching up to 1,800 pounds of bombs and rockets -- or additional machine guns or 20mm cannon pods.

A top speed of 370 mph, a 340-mile combat radius (fully loaded), and a ceiling altitude of 35,000 feet. (Oh, and Embraer says the plane can also conduct limited air-to-air operations, carrying AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles.)


Perhaps best of all, the Super Tucano costs an estimated $500 an hour to operate -- a big selling point for a cash-strapped customer such as Afghanistan, In fact, that's about one-sixth the operating cost of Textron's ultra-cheap Scorpion light fighter jet.

What it means to investors

The U.S. Air Force awarded Embraer the contract to build 20 Super Tucanos for $427 million -- $355 million for the planes themselves, plus $72 million in additional costs incurred as the Air Force dealt with multiple challenges to the contract award. Back out those extra costs, and it looks like the Air Force is paying about $17.8 million per plane -- just under the likely cost to build a new A-10 Warthog today.

What's more, Afghanistan might buy more planes (or the Pentagon might do so for them). When first announced, in fact, the Super Tucano contract was said to be worth potentially $950 million to Embraer. That suggests long-range plans to buy as many as 52 Super Tucanos.

Is this how things will play out? With U.S. troops still in Afghanistan, the Air Force cooling its enthusiasm for the A-10 Warthog, and Lockheed's F-35 in hot water over its gun's inability to shoot, it's entirely possible we might buy more A-29 Super Tucanos for Afghanistan. In which case, the value of Embraer's initial sales contract could double or more.

At a hypothetical value of $1 billion, this single contract could be worth nearly 18% of Embraer's overall annual revenue -- and nearly as much as the company's entire defense business sells in a year. Fifty-two new planes would also grow the global fleet of Super Tucanos in service by 30%, producing more maintenance and services revenue, potentially even bigger economies of scale in production, and bigger profits for Embraer.

Speaking of which, profit-wise, Embraer already earns a 10% operating profit margin on its defense business, according to S&P Capital IQ. That makes defense Embraer's single most profitable business division.

As these birds start alighting in Afghanistan, Embraer's profits could get even bigger.
Posted by:gorb

#10  But, but, no. :)

Each conflict got different CAS requirements and budgets, this looks win, win.
Posted by: Shipman   2015-04-06 14:19  

#9  Found this.
Posted by: gorb   2015-04-06 13:08  

#8  The Tuc is already being used by a few South American air forces that can't afford jets.

Fred points out the similarities to the P51. Check in Wiki on the fly-off competition of the turbo-prop derivative P51 versus the A10, back when the AF was required to have the competition.
Posted by: Steve White   2015-04-06 12:41  

#7  They could do worse.
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-04-06 12:39  

#6  Looks like the sainted P51.
Posted by: Fred   2015-04-06 10:30  

#5  Not a bad little prop plane for air to mud. Definitely can see it being wanted by a lot of smaller countries that don't need or can afford the jets.
Posted by: DarthVader   2015-04-06 09:47  

#4  Wonder where the Soro 'piece of the action' is on the Tucano?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-04-06 09:15  

#3  ...The Super Tucano is absolutely perfect for the Afghans - who, in all honesty, probably won't be doing their own maintenance anyways. Keep in mind that even the Hog (All Glory And Honor Unto Her) is 'austere' only by USAF standards and would be roughly the equivalent of dropping an F-4 onto a USAAF base in 1945.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2015-04-06 07:59  

#2  A-10 needs it's own RB Category.
Posted by: Shipman   2015-04-06 07:37  

#1  Only one small problem with the Tuc, it's commonly referred to as the armament and or 'bomb load.'

A-10 Armament

Guns: 1× 30 mm (1.18 in) GAU-8/A Avenger Gatling cannon with 1,174 rounds (Capacity 1,350)
Hardpoints: 11 (8× under-wing and 3× under-fuselage pylon stations) with a capacity of 16,000 lb (7,260 kg) and provisions to carry combinations of: Rockets:
4× LAU-61/LAU-68 rocket pods (each with 19× / 7× Hydra 70 mm rockets, respectively)
4× LAU-5003 rocket pods (each with 19× CRV7 70 mm rockets)
6× LAU-10 rocket pods (each with 4× 127 mm (5.0 in) Zuni rockets)

Missiles:
2× AIM-9 Sidewinders air-to-air missiles for self-defense
6× AGM-65 Maverick air-to-surface missiles

Bombs:
Mark 80 series of unguided iron bombs or
Mk 77 incendiary bombs or
BLU-1, BLU-27/B Rockeye II, Mk20, BL-755[163] and CBU-52/58/71/87/89/97 cluster bombs or
Paveway series of Laser-guided bombs or
Joint Direct Attack Munition (A-10C)[164] or
Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser (A-10C)

Other:
SUU-42A/A Flares/Infrared decoys and chaff dispenser pod or
AN/ALQ-131 or AN/ALQ-184 ECM pods or
Lockheed Martin Sniper XR or LITENING targeting pods (A-10C) or
2× 600 US gallon Sargent Fletcher drop tanks for increased range/loitering time.

Posted by: Besoeker   2015-04-06 02:04  

00:00