Submit your comments on this article |
Government |
Supreme Court strikes down Maryland double-tax law |
2015-05-19 |
![]() In a 5-4 ruling, the justices agreed with a lower court that the tax is unconstitutional because it discourages Maryland residents from earning money outside the state. "Maryland's tax scheme is inherently discriminatory," the justices wrote in the majority opinion. They wrote that the policy effectively discourages "interstate commerce." The ruling said: "If every State adopted Maryland's tax structure, interstate commerce would be taxed at a higher rate than intrastate commerce." The ruling could have far-reaching consequences beyond just Maryland. It also could affect similar laws in other states, including New York, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Ohio. At issue in this case is Maryland's treatment of money earned out of state. Most states give residents a full credit for income taxes paid on money earned out of state. Yet Maryland, while allowing residents to deduct income taxes paid to other states from their state tax, did not apply that deduction to a local "piggy back" tax collected for counties and some city governments. Maryland claimed it had authority to tax all the income its residents earn to pay for local services like public schools. The challenge to the policy was brought by a Maryland businessman who earned money in multiple states, and complained about the double-tax. In the near-term, the court decision could cost Maryland hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. |
Posted by:Fred |
#6 What would happen if the total Fed plus two states plus counties plus cities exceeded 100%? What if you had income from four states who all claimed full tax on all the income? It could happen... |
Posted by: Glenmore 2015-05-19 21:48 |
#5 Work is not a benefit. How stupid do you have to be to sit there? |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2015-05-19 18:28 |
#4 Maryland isn't a commonwealth. VA, MA, PA, and KY are. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2015-05-19 09:28 |
#3 Just avoid any place that calls itself a "commonwealth." |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2015-05-19 09:19 |
#2 Ginsberg ruled against it say essentially....'worker accessed benefits from both states, therefore he/she should PAY in both states.' Something wrong with this lady, can't put my finger on it, but there's definately something wrong. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2015-05-19 09:00 |
#1 It was another 5 to 4 ruling but not on conservative vs liberal lines.interesting vote. |
Posted by: Deacon Blues 2015-05-19 08:34 |