You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
What Syrian Chemical Weapons Reveal about Obama
2015-05-22
It's now indisputably clear that Obama is no more than a paper tiger. His threats against the Syrian dictatorship meant nothing but vanished into thin air, replaced by squirming and prattle.

Not only is this response important in itself, but it has implications for other hostile states, notably Russia, China, and especially Iran. If Obama dares not handle the weakling in Damascus, how might he venture to do so with the more formidable foes in Moscow, Peking, and Tehran?

For this reason, the issue of Assad's chemical weapons is crucial to American foreign policy. Like many observers, I count the months (still another 20 of them) until this president is gone and the United States of America has an opportunity for a fresh start to stand by its word, live up to its historic reputation, and protect itself.
I don't think anyone who's read Rantburg for more than five minutes has any illusion that B.O. is anything more than an empty suit. As a "community organizer" he's top notch. As a sleazy politician he can't be beat. He's a lot better golfer than he is a leader or a statesman. Pipes could have written the same piece five years ago and hardly changed a word.
Posted by:Elmerert Hupens2660

#7  Bibi, p2k?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-05-22 08:22  

#6  The only war Obama has a stake in is to eliminate political opposition at home. All else is just a distraction.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-05-22 07:46  

#5  Elmerert Hupens2660: It was made quite clear that these moderate Taliban were to turn over ben Laden first.

Posted by: BernardZ   2015-05-22 06:24  

#4  We know who Obama's enemies are---and it's not Assad, or ISIS, or MM.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-05-22 02:29  

#3  Right, Obama's not at fault, It's all Bush (*Obama's lie".)
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2015-05-22 01:41  

#2  
"These demands are not open to negotiation or discussion. The Taliban must act, and act immediately. They will hand over the terrorists, or they will share in their fate."
George W. Bush, Statement To Joint Session Of Congress
September 20th 2001

The Taliban didn't hand over anyone. Yet less than a month later Secretary of State Powell offered political power to Taliban 'moderates'.

When it comes to 'red lines' and ultimatums loose talk and sending mixed messages are traits of both the Bush and Obama administrations.

The Bush administration's lapse was arguably much more serious because it concerned basic, vital and non-negotiable security interests of the US.
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660   2015-05-22 01:06  

#1  Obama is no more than a paper tiger

No he is a

Opposite color than a white flag, but just the same effect, surrenders to the opposition with out a real fight, but with a black flag he seems, with his rhetoric, to really be fighting the good fight. "Rah, Rah, look at me , I'm a fighter" then he drops the flag and runs.
Posted by: Ulusoque Ulairt2917   2015-05-22 00:55  

00:00