Submit your comments on this article | ||
-Land of the Free | ||
House Dem Introduces Legislation Requiring All Gun Owners To Get Liability Insurance | ||
2015-05-31 | ||
[BREITBART] On May 29, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) introduced legislation requiring all would-be gun owners to purchase liability insurance before being allowed to purchase a firearm. If caught without liability insurance, gun owners would face a fine of "$10,000." According to The Hill, Maloney released a statement saying, "We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns. The results are clear: car fatalities have declined by 25 percent in the last decade, but gun fatalities continue to rise."
| ||
Posted by:Fred |
#12 Bill is DOA, its a stunt to prove that the Democrats still hate individuals who defend themselves. |
Posted by: OldSpook 2015-05-31 20:16 |
#11 Politicians should get insurance for the potential harm they do, for making stupid comments, and for disastrous legislation. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2015-05-31 17:43 |
#10 at least his insurance will cover my medical costs, right? Right? Yes, Rambler, in a way. Like the uninsured motorist coverage you have to buy to cover damages caused by those who somehow neglect to obey the law to buy insurance. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2015-05-31 15:40 |
#9 Is it the same for gun owners? If it's nopt (and NRA insurance rates suggest it is not) then the conclusion would seem to be that gun ownership, per se, is not a particularly dangerous actuarial category. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2015-05-31 15:38 |
#8 So, the insurance rages will probably looks something like this: Owning a gun: $10/year Owning a gun and bullets: 1000year Owning a gun and bullets that are not locked in a time locked safe that only the police can open: 10000/year Being a veteran or Tea Partier who owns a gun that is not locked up permanently: 100000/year |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2015-05-31 14:50 |
#7 So, if a gangbanger shoots me with an illegal gun, at least his insurance will cover my medical costs, right? Right? |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2015-05-31 14:46 |
#6 Like cellphones, utilities and other things the rest of us pay for, it'll be tacked on as a tax to help the perpetually unemployed. |
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839 2015-05-31 13:10 |
#5 Charles C.W. Cooke took this one apart yesterday. |
Posted by: Raj 2015-05-31 11:56 |
#4 We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns. When one engages in risky activities -- scuba diving and skiing that I know of from personal experience -- one's life and health insurance costs go up. Is it the same for gun owners? |
Posted by: trailing wife 2015-05-31 10:06 |
#3 We require insurance to own a car, but no such requirement exists for guns. There’s no insurance requirement to neither purchase nor own a car. Those are State requirements (Not Federal) for operation of a vehicle on public roadways. In fact, one doesn’t even need a drivers license. Just ask Miss Daisy. |
Posted by: DepotGuy 2015-05-31 08:48 |
#2 We need insurance against stupid politicians. Every time they talk I feel my brain start to hurt. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2015-05-31 08:37 |
#1 Washington Times, same BS story. FBI crime stats sez gun crime is actually in decline. Maloney provides no clue as to how gang-bangers will be insured. Perhaps Obamacare will provide a gun owner - ghetto subsidy. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2015-05-31 04:46 |