You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
News form Kennewick, Richland, and Pasco: 'Kennewich man' probably an Indian.
2015-06-19
[HuffPoo] The 9,500-year-old skeleton was found in 1996 along the banks of the Columbia River in Kennewick, Wash., and it's been called the most important ancient human skeleton ever unearthed in North America.

But as to Kennewick Man's ethnicity and origins, researchers haven't been able to agree.

Some scientists argued that he was likely related to indigenous Japanese or Polynesian peoples, others said that he had Caucasian features. Still other scientists were convinced that he was probably an ancestor of modern-day Native Americans -- and a new DNA study suggests that, indeed, they're right.

"Using ancient DNA, we were able to show that Kennewick Man is more closely related to Native Americans than any other population," Dr. Morten Rasmussen, a researcher at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and an author of the study, said in a written statement.
Posted by:Besoeker

#3  Grampaw!
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418    2015-06-19 16:18  

#2  P2k, if 'Kennewich man' is not (Amer)Indian, then Indians are not Native Americans---just a bit unPC, eh?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-06-19 10:29  

#1  
"Using ancient DNA, we were able to show that Kennewick Man is more closely related to Native Americans than any other population,"


Would you like to quantify that or would it be too messy? What was the amount of difference between NA DNA and Kennewich and say Ainu and how far back goes the branching?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-06-19 07:50  

00:00