You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Number affected by hack soars to 18M, agency head says nobody '€˜personally responsible'
2015-06-24
[Fox News] Fox News has learned that the number of victims of a pair of massive cyberattacks on U.S. government personnel files has soared to at least 18 million -- but the head of the hacked Office of Personnel Management refuses to blame anyone in her agency.

"I don't believe anyone is personally responsible," OPM Director Katherine Archuleta said Tuesday.

The statement came during tense Capitol Hill testimony on a breach that seems to be growing wider by the day. Archuleta, who faced tough questioning at a House hearing last week, likewise faced angry senators on Tuesday before a Senate appropriations subcommittee.

Grilled on whether anyone takes responsibility, Archuleta said only the perpetrators should be blamed -- she said current failures result from decades of meager investment in security systems, but said changes are being made and in fact helped detect the latest breaches.

Still, the assurances are unlikely to ease concerns on Capitol Hill and among those who may have been affected. The web has expanded to include not just current and former government workers, but also those who may have applied for a government job.

The Office of Personnel Management initially estimated about 4 million current and former government workers were affected by one of the hacks. But Fox News is told by multiple sources that lawmakers have been informed the number will grow to at least 18 million -- and could, according to one source, soar to as high as 30 million.

During the Senate committee hearing on Tuesday, Archuleta testified that a second hack indeed exposed more individuals, though she said its "scope" and "impact" have not yet been determined.
No worries, banking and investment firms are the next targets. What a delightful way to re-baseline the monetary system, end economic inequality, and level the playing field. Investment securities, precious metals, and paper money are so old school. Join me in blaming the Chinese, Russians, Euro-weenies, or whomever.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  ...and don't forget all those annual bonuses garnered by no one responsible. So, if they weren't responsible why did they get those bonuses? /rhet question.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-06-24 21:50  

#5  The degree of incompetence and avarice of this administration is such that nothing surprises me anymore. The computers magically arrived, set themselves up, then went on-line w/o human intervention. Sure.
Posted by: irishrageboy   2015-06-24 17:01  

#4  Seems to me if nobody else is gonna take responsibility the buck should stop on the desk in the Oval Office. But then he was busy with ObamaCare, GerbilWorming, amnesty and now selling us down the river with TPP so he had no time for the security of our country's computer systems. So she's right. No one is to blame.

But if he was the CIO of a for profit corporation he'd be outta work by now. A good CIO would demand investment in security systems and resign if he didn't get it. Better to resign in protest before the failure than afterwards.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2015-06-24 16:36  

#3  The problem is that the Chinese may not be interested in petty identity theft. They are probably looking for people they can blackmail into "cooperating".

So if you don't have anything in your history that would make you blackmailable, you probably don't have anything to worry about (yet).
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2015-06-24 15:25  

#2  Got my 'you've been hacked' letter yesterday and Spousal Unit got hers last week. So far no indications of nefarious activity.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2015-06-24 14:15  

#1  If any other entity other than the government had done this, the tort lawyers would be filling the broadcast times with ads.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-06-24 09:23  

00:00