| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Will America's Feminization of Men Impede Its Ability to Defend Itself? |
| 2015-08-07 |
| h/t Instapundit A reader poses an interesting question: Dr. Helen, Do you ever think or worry (not that this is the right way to couch it) that where we are going with the feminizing of males, vs. the world at large, i.e. ISIS etc. what the long term implications are for America? I spent 6 years in the military, enjoyed every minute of it and never a second thought would we ever be in a place where I was actually concerned about the country's ability to defend itself. I'm not so sure I'm there anymore. Being a male is not so easy. Thoughts? |
| Posted by:g(r)omgoru |
| #2 War, like Econ + Conspiracy, IS A "COALITION" I.E. A COMBO = "PERFECT STORM"? OF FACTORS, INTERESTS, + AGENDAS, ETC. So the Axioms or Adages SAY. The desire to set up effective + permanent OWG-NWO + US-GLOBAL SOCIALIST ORDER = THE US-ALLIES CAN'T OR WON'T BE ALLOWED TO DEFEAT THE ISIS, AL-NUSRA, + ALIGNED HARD BOYZ JUST YET. In fact, US-WORLD OWG GLOBIES ARE ONLY NOT ALLOWING THE ISIS, ETAL. TO BE DEFEATED OR DESTROYED AT THIS TIME, BUT ARE DIRECTLY ANDOR INDIRECTLY HELPING THEM GET MILPOL STRONGER RELATIVE TO THE "WEAK/ DECLINING", EX-SOLE-SOON-TO-BE-ONE-OF-MANY CO-SUPERPOWERS USA ITSELF. Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, + Mahan, etc. would argue the above is a recipe for MilPol/Geopol Self-Suicide + National, Geopol Catastrophe. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-08-07 19:58 |
| #1 I thought with the removal of the ban on women in combat, that 200 years of 'disparate impact' upon males, it would be just females drafted the next time around. Your turn sweetheart to protect the oligarchs that gave you power and influence. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-08-07 15:39 |