You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Heavily armed 'Oath Keepers' inject new unease to Ferguson
2015-08-11
[NY POST] FERGUSON, Mo. -- Four civilians carrying military-style rifles and sidearms patrolled a riot-torn street in Ferguson, Missouri, early Tuesday, saying they were there to protect a media organization but drawing swift criticism from police and protesters alike.
No mention made of POS wearing man dress and kufi.
The appearance of the four men, all white, quickly drew stares in the mostly black neighborhood, which exploded into violence again on Sunday night as protesters marked the police killing of an unarmed black teen a year ago.

The men identified themselves as part of a group called "Oath Keepers," which describes itself as an association of current and former US soldiers and police who aim to protect the Constitution.
The Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit civil rights organization, has described the "Oath Keepers" as a "fiercely anti-government, militaristic group," and St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar condemned their appearance in Ferguson.

"Their presence was both unnecessary and inflammatory," he said, adding that police would work with county prosecutors to see if the men had broken any laws.

Led by a man who gave his name only as John, the group, whose members wore bulletproof vests and carried sidearms in addition to combat-style rifles, said they had come to protect a journalist from the conservative "Infowars.com" website.

"There were problems here, there were people who got hurt. We needed to be prepared for that," said the man, who noted that Missouri state laws generally allow the open carrying of heavy weapons of the kind that his group were brandishing.

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit civil rights organization, has described the "Oath Keepers" as a "fiercely anti-government, militaristic group," and St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar condemned their appearance in Ferguson.
Chief Belmar also condemned the group in paragraph three, in case you missed it.
"Their presence was both unnecessary and inflammatory," he said, adding that police would work with county prosecutors to see if the men had broken any laws.

Led by a man who gave his name only as John, the group, whose members wore bulletproof vests and carried sidearms in addition to combat-style rifles, said they had come to protect a journalist from the conservative "Infowars.com" website.

"There were problems here, there were people who got hurt. We needed to be prepared for that," said the man, who noted that Missouri state laws generally allow the open carrying of heavy weapons of the kind that his group were brandishing.
Wrong narrative! Only agitators shipped into Ferguson by leftist groups are welcome. Armed, Law and Order conservatives must go home and be silent.
Posted by:Besoeker

#15  Since when was info wars conservative? They're troofers and conspiracy nuts as far left as they are far right
Posted by: OldSpook   2015-08-11 23:56  

#14  Please correct me iff I'm wrong, but didn't the "OathKeepers" start out in the 1990's as a backlash or counter-response by peaceful mainstream US Males agz alleged on-going "de-masculinization(s)" of Men by US Feminazis???

"Men in support of Men + all things Manly/Malehood".

[MWC's AL BUNDY + "NO MAAM" = "NATIONAL ORG. OF MEN AGZ AMAZONIAN MASTERHOOD" here]???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-08-11 23:10  

#13  It's our riot, not yours! Police jurisdictional dispute.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-08-11 19:43  

#12  One thing I haven't seen reported is that the Oath Keepers were also telling the protesters "We've got your back"

Bad journalism or deliberate omission?
Posted by: DarthVader   2015-08-11 18:31  

#11  Google Peel's Nice Principles of Policing.

The federal "police" are more like a Securitaté.

The Oath Keepers are vastly nearer to a police than the current lot.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2015-08-11 16:58  

#10  If the government refuses to act, then it forfeits its legitimacy and power. That it fears more than towns or cities burning.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-08-11 16:54  

#9  "Their presence was both unnecessary and inflammatory," said St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar.

Really? There doesn't seem to be much governmental control in Ferguson over the rabble and thug elements. Install martial law and shoot violators of curfew on sight. Shut it down as tight as a drum; otherwise STFU. This has gone on way too long.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-08-11 16:19  

#8  cut off EBT access and watch the riots fizzle
Posted by: Frank G   2015-08-11 15:21  

#7  When frighteningly normal folks' weapons
Are sniffed at by newshounds, what happens?
Why don't those of bangers
Or Panthers or "singers"
Provoke military-style fappings?
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2015-08-11 15:07  

#6  At some point the media hate will turn them into targets for angry yuts. Nobody but the insurance companies wants them there, they should let Ferguson burn according to plan.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-08-11 14:51  

#5  Military Style == 'Scary Looking' in the eyes of the media.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-08-11 14:00  

#4  military style? Full auto?
heavy weapons? Mortars? SAWs? Grenade launchers?


Hyperbole much?
Posted by: AlanC   2015-08-11 13:56  

#3  The Oath Keepers were evidently successful. Nothing in the news about any 'Infowars' whacko's being bullied, kidnapped, or shot. Perhaps a mechanized rifle company of Oath Keepers is needed.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-08-11 13:16  

#2  The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2015-08-11 13:10  

#1  Funny. The streets are riot torn and they want the police to see if the 4 white guys broke any laws. Now that is racial profiling.
Posted by: Airandee   2015-08-11 12:25  

00:00