| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Kerry: If we reject Iran deal, world will lose faith in US leadership |
| 2015-08-12 |
| [IsraelTimes] Even before talks, Tehran dropped pursuit of nuclear weapons, secretary of state says; claims dollar could sink if pact struck down If Congress were to reject the world powers' nuclear deal with Iran, US leadership and the stability of the US dollar would be threatened, Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you knowKerry Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat,conqueror of Cambodia, and current Secretary of State... warned Tuesday. Speaking to an audience in New York City at an open discussion on the merits of the agreement, Kerry also emphasized that Tehran had shown restraint in its pursuit of an atomic weapon even before talks began toward the deal, which puts curbs on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Kerry lashed out at critics of the deal, reached between Iran and the P5+1 nations -- the US, Britannia, La Belle France, Russia, China and Germany -- last month, who say that the United States should reject the agreement, reapply sanctions, and return to the bargaining table to hammer out a more stringent deal. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been the most strident critic of the deal outside the US. The secretary of state asked audience members to consider a situation in which the US reimposed sanctions, and then "is going to start sanctioning our allies and their businesses after we walk away from the deal? Are you kidding me?" He warned, "That is a recipe very quickly for the American dollar to cease to be the reserve currency of the world -- that is already bubbling out there." Later in his talk, Kerry indicated that the Department of the Treasury has been preparing a report that would delineate the potential damage to the US economy should Congress reject the deal. "The notion that we can just sort of diss the deal and unilaterally walk away, as Congress wants to do, will have a profound negative impact on people's sense of American leadership and reliability," he cautioned. He acknowledged that America's "judgment is that clearly there was a period in which Iran was chasing a nuclear weapon," but seemed to indicate that that pursuit had ceased before Iran came to the negotiating table in 2013, a statement that is in line with American intelligence assessments. "There has been a fight within Iran, and it continues in some quarters, about where they should go with respect to their nuclear program," Kerry noted. "They have not pursued a weapon, to our best judgment and to the judgment of our allies, since that period of time," he continued, referring to the previous decade. "The Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa that nobody should pursue a nuclear weapon," he argued. "And we've essentially said to them, 'Let's take that fatwa and make it into an agreement.' Nonetheless, he added, "the [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps] still wants one, and they are opposed to the agreement, but the government has adopted an agreement in which they are forbidden forever from producing a nuclear bomb. "When I hear a congressman or senator say we should get a better deal -- that is not going to happen," Kerry emphasized. "There is not a better deal to be gotten." He said that in both 2003 and 2008, president George W. Bush "tried to get a better deal," but that following both of those attempts, Iran expanded its enrichment capacity and stockpiled the resulting fissile material, which can be used to build a bomb. Kerry reiterated his claim that, throughout that time, "they could rapidly break out if they chose too, but they didn't. "They are a nuclear threshold nation today," he added. "They became that and they became that when we had a policy of no enrichment." Still, he argued, "when they had enough fissile material for 10 to 12 bombs, we don't believe they went ahead and tried to make that bomb." |
| Posted by:trailing wife |
| #12 They are all so much more clever than we are! Yes, that is bitter sarcasm. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2015-08-12 12:52 |
| #11 I would bet Schumer talked to the Beast, too |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2015-08-12 12:45 |
| #10 You shouldn't think Shumer is not part of the deal. I'm sure he spoke to McConnell before his announcement. |
| Posted by: jvalentour 2015-08-12 10:26 |
| #9 theater. McConnel is already arranging a veto-possible margin in the Senate so it looks like they are rejecting it but in the end allow it to go through. the GOP leadership is the most thoroughly disingenuous and possibly corrupt people in DC. At least the Dems and Libs are pretty obvious about what they are up to. McConnel & Boner are weasels. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2015-08-12 09:57 |
| #8 Congress will reject the Agreement, with 59 votes. |
| Posted by: jvalentour 2015-08-12 06:24 |
| #7 But if congress rejects, there is a glimmer of hope that the US constitution still matters. |
| Posted by: Airandee 2015-08-12 06:19 |
| #6 Without naming names, I suspect there is an easily recognizable camp which would celebrate the removal of the Jew from the Middle East as well as the white man from Africa. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-08-12 02:29 |
| #5 Nope. The best deal would be USA attacking Israel for them---O & Co are working on this now. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-12 02:03 |
| #4 Mr.Kerry is right, Iran got the best deal they wanted. |
| Posted by: Steven 2015-08-12 01:50 |
| #3 Anybody collected all of Kerry's predictions of "disaster if we reject the Iran deal"? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-12 01:48 |
| #2 Will? Seems they already have, Lurch. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2015-08-12 01:20 |
| #1 Still partaking of this it seems Mr Kerry: |
| Posted by: 3dc 2015-08-12 01:16 |