| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Signs, Portents, and the Weather- |
| 11-year-old rape victim gives birth after being denied a termination by religious demagogues |
| 2015-08-14 |
| Posted by:Anon1 |
| #9 Well, nobody asks you too, right? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-14 13:58 |
| #8 g(r)omgoru, I don't want the blood from your kind of evolution on my hands. I'm not God so I don't feel qualified for that kind of decision making. OTOH, I feel no requirement to support the bitch and her fatherless children. Let her live with the consequences of her own behavior. I want no part of any of it. |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2015-08-14 13:50 |
| #7 Think evolution JFM. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-14 12:36 |
| #6 I would be happier if she had suicided instead of f.. around and then having her babies cut to pieces. |
| Posted by: JFM 2015-08-14 12:30 |
| #5 It was only that she found more convenient to have abortions than to use contraceptives. And, unless you can prove that her choices are devoid of genetic component, I'm not unhappy with her choices. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-14 12:27 |
| #4 No, g(r)omgoru. I want to destroy the "Pro Choice" mantra. A woman who doesn't want children has many means to not have them so abortion is not about "choice" it is about not wanting to bother. I remember a debate on TV, a woman had aborted six times, six, and quiet happy about it. She was not a teenager who in an instant, more exactly six of them, of passion forgot about the consequences of having sex but a thirty something experienced woman. She was not dim witted or ignorant: from the description of her jobs it looks like she had MBA. It was only that she found more convenient to have abortions than to use contraceptives. |
| Posted by: JFM 2015-08-14 11:43 |
| #3 JFM, do you really want such dim bitches to pass their genes on? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-08-14 05:03 |
| #2 And that justifies the killing of millions of babies who were not the product of rape but of their mothers not wanting to be bothered with contraceptives or condoms? |
| Posted by: JFM 2015-08-14 05:01 |
| #1 Therehas een a bit of discussion of late on thisissue what with the planned parenthood stories. This is the other side of the coin. I reckon denying this child access to a medical procedure in the first trimester before the foetus becomes a viable human baby is ethically wrong. She should have had access to it, immediately. |
| Posted by: Anon1 2015-08-14 00:06 |