| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| More troubling results from the new F-35 Lightning |
| 2015-08-16 |
|
| Posted by:DarthVader |
| #11 And the problem is that too many look at the F35 like this: |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2015-08-16 22:51 |
| #10 Just remember that a stopped clock is right twice a day. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2015-08-16 21:40 |
| #9 And you're right. Two advisers, one for Biden and one from the Center for American Progress, a Hillary linked astroturf group. |
| Posted by: badanov 2015-08-16 18:18 |
| #8 Certainly not the first time Hot Air got punked, and prolly won't be the last. |
| Posted by: badanov 2015-08-16 18:10 |
| #7 http://nsnetwork.org : The National Security Network (NSN) works to strengthen American national security by creating and advancing progressive policies for exercising American power and addressing global challenges. Ha! Ya got punked. For more laughs, check out their policy papers and board of directors. Their next policy paper: Living with the Consequences: The Effects of Voting Down the Iran Nuclear Agreement Policy Brief by J. Dana Stuster July 28, 2015 Should Congress vote down the nuclear agreement with Iran, it will inhibit the ability of the United States to implement an effective foreign policy for the foreseeable future. Rejecting the deal will alienate U.S. allies and diminish U.S. standing in future negotiations. It will isolate the United States both diplomatically and economically, as the sanctions regime collapses and rivals set up a new financial infrastructure that will undermine the effectiveness of U.S. sanctions. It will empower the hardliners in Iran that drive the worst elements of Iran’s regional policies, |
| Posted by: Betty Hitler2611 2015-08-16 17:54 |
| #6 Well the F35 program does do at least one thing extremely well: it keeps retired generals and admirals and other senior retired O's who have a lot of procurement and acquisition experience employed. |
| Posted by: anymouse 2015-08-16 17:13 |
| #5 This was predictable. One airframe does not fit all missions. We still need 1) An air superiority aircraft. 2) a long range bomber/interdiction strike craft 3) CAS The Navy and USAF need to agree to disagree on 1-2 and develop the one that fits their mission profiles. 3 should be left to the Army and Marines. Not I siad aircraft. This includes possibly unmanned combat vehicles, including a mannned controller and a swarm of drones flying with it. |
| Posted by: OldSpook 2015-08-16 13:09 |
| #4 |
| Posted by: 2015-08-16 11:46 |
| #3 More costly than the moon project. |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2015-08-16 10:29 |
| #2 ..graft, lots of graft. (do I need to put a /sarc on that?) |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-08-16 09:14 |
| #1 Are there any good results from this piece of shit? |
| Posted by: chris 2015-08-16 08:49 |