You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
It's Time to Confront Beijing About the South China Sea
2015-08-24

With this Commander in chief? What are we going to do? Send James Taylor? Beyonce? Barbara Streisand?
To allow China to continue to expand its role and expectations invites future conflict on a larger scale.

China has continued its aggressive actions in the South China Sea. Events from ramming Vietnamese fishing boats to continued dredging and land reclamation demonstrate aggressive intent, bad faith and disrespect for their regional neighbors. It is clear from these actions that Bejing has no intent on reversing course or even finding a middle-ground, arbitrated approach to their territorial claims in the South China Sea. The United States, in cooperation with its allies and partners in the Western Pacific, needs to step up its response.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#3  More Net News ...

* NATIONAL INTEREST > THE BUZZ: ON DISPLAY: CHINA'S MASTER PLAN TO SINK THE US NAVY.

Or, more accurately or realistically, DETER + KEEP THE US NAVY + USDOD FAR AWAY OTH FROM THE MAIN THEATERS OF CONFLICT.

ARTIC = denotes that China has tested the DF-26 BM that can strike at GUAM, + DF-5 ICBM that can hit anywhere in the US.

Again, as per China fighting wars for strategic access vee the "First Island Chain" [US Allies], IMO China will prioritize trying to keep the US out of any military conflict ASAP AMAP ALAP between it + various US Regional Allies. THIS IS EXCLUSIVE OF ANY PRE-EXISTING OR PARALLEL ANTI-US US OWG GLOBALIST AGENDA TO HELP CHINA, RUSSIA, + IRAN ATTAIN OR EXPAND THEIR "SPHERE(S) OF INFLUENCE" TO THE DETRIMENT OF US ALLIES + US "SOLE" STRATEGIC INTERESTS.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > US OUTRAGED AT CHINA RUNAWAY [aircraft runway] CONSTRUCTION IN SOUTH CHINA SEA.

What is mighty "red line" defender + Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS Obama going to do about it???

* TOPIX > [Xinhuanet] CHINA RE-AFFIRMS [its]NON-ACCEPTANCE OF [UN = International, Third-party] ARBITRATION ON SOUTH CHINA SEA: FOREIGN MINISTRY.

China FM Spox Hua Chunyang.

Well theres NOT-a-Shock.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-08-24 22:09  

#2  CHINA as a "US-style", "US-par", OWG Co-SUperpower wants want the Cold War-era US + USSR had, + the US still has, i.e. "strategic access" via overseas Milbases for the PLA + Econ hubs, which China has NOT been getting in East Asia-Pacific + IOR due to the bulk of the countries in these Region(s) being either pro-US/West, andor US,West-leaning NAM Nations.

As long as China doesn't shoot first at US Regional Allies, IMO Beijing is counting on mighty "red line" defender" + Anti-US US Globalist POTUS Obama + aligned NOT to stop China's activities in the SCS, ECS [Japan], + IOR [Indo-Pak]. BE IT CHINA, PUTINIST RUSSIA, + IRAN, GLOBALIST OBAMA WILL ALLOW THEM TO EXPAND + FORM THIER OWN [Core]"SPHERE(S) OF INFLUENCE" AS BEFITTING A USoAMERIKA CO-SUPERPOWER SIBLING.

Many MSM-Net Perts-Bloggers are considering the desired EEZS-SEZS of the Philippines, Vietnam, ASEAN + Nippon to be all but officially lost vee China + the Bammer's PCorrect-Deniable "non-action/inaction" agz China. IFF US REGIONAL ALLIES WANT THEIR EEZS-SEZS OR OTHER BACK, THEY'LL HAVE TO MILITARILY FIGHT CHINA TO DO SO, + WIDOUT GUARANTY THAT GLOBALIST AMERIKA WILL BE THERE TO BACK THEIR SIX AS OBAMA DID VEE THE ANTI-ASSAD SYRIAN REBELS.

* US-LED ANTI-US OWG-NWO + GLOBALISM = OBAMA + ALIGNED COVERTLY PCORRECTLY-DENIABLY WANTS CHINA, RUSSIA, + IRAN, OTHER? TO EXPAND THEIR CO-SUPERPOWER AUTHORITY-N-INFLUENCE.

"NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON", as the saying goes, correct!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-08-24 19:45  

#1  Obama make a decision that showed balls? be serious.

He is MUCH better at bowing. Ever seen him Bow? Obama's good.

His bow in Saudi was particularly deep. And his bow in japan to the Emperor was magnificent. Spell Obsequious for me.

But then Democrats are known for their Principles and values.
Posted by: Vinegar Smith1154   2015-08-24 06:29  

00:00