You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Chinese warships spotted off the coast of Alaska
2015-09-03
President Obama isn't the only one making a visit to Alaska this week, according to a new report from Pentagon officials. The U.S. military has spotted five Chinese navy ships off the coast of Alaska in the Bering Sea, heading in the direction of the Aleutian Islands. The presence of the Chinese ships, including three combat ships, a replenishment vessel, and an amphibious ship, marks the first time that the U.S. military has reported seeing "any such activity in the area," The Wall Street Journal reports.

Although China's defense ministry could not be reached by the Journal for comment, the presence of Chinese warships close to U.S. territory is likely connected to China's efforts to ramp up its military activity as its economic power expands. "I don't think we'd characterize anything they're doing as threatening," one defense official told The Wall Street Journal.

Other officials theorized that the ships' presence could be due to China's growing interest in using the Northern Sea Route to transport goods, since that route between Asia and the West can be up to several days faster than the Suez Canal route. "It's difficult to tell exactly, but it indicates some interest in the Arctic region," one Pentagon official said. "It's different."
The, er, "interesting players" in the world know that the U.S. will be under the thumb of Ocluster for another 16 months and will make the most of it. This will not be a fun ride.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#5  See also TOPIX, WORLD NEWS > IS WAGING/FIGHTING WAR WID A WEAK COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF WORTH THE RISK?

HHHMMMMM, HHHMMMMM, I would say it would depend on a how far the "Weak/Declining" USA, wid its US-N-Only-The-US, Unilateral or Self "Retreat/
Fallback is OWG + World Peace" Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS Obama WANTS TO RETREAT OR FALL BACK IN THE WORLD?

To go from being a post-Cold War, post-9-11, World-dominating Sole Superpower to being a One-of-Many-OWG-Co-Superpowers, + somehow to also deter or avoid being EXISTENTIALLY THREATENED IN THE PROCESS???

VERSUS

* FREEREPUBLIC > [Political Insider = WND] FORMER CIA OFFICER [Claire Lopez] JUST EXPOSED OBAMA ...
... OUR WORST FEARS ARE TRUE.

* WORLD NEWS > ISIS MASTERMIND: "ISLAM IS COMING".

The Islamist-Jihadist Caliphate is here, NOW-N-FOREVER; + the ISIS can't + won't be defeated by the US-Allies.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-09-03 22:53  

#4  Yosemite Sam----It was known that the President was to visit Alaska over a month ago. The jet with the White House Advance Team (WHAT) was seen in Kotzebue on July 17, a C-40 (737-700). They checked out Kivalina and Kotzebue for the President's visit. There were announcements in early August. PLA probably read the emails, too.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2015-09-03 20:32  

#3  "I can see Beijing from my hotel room"
Posted by: swksvolFF   2015-09-03 19:52  

#2  Something nobody questions is how did China find out the POTUS schedule. How did they know he would be in Alaska then? Ships just don't appear - it took days if not a week to get up there and at least several weeks to plan and gather/load-out supplies for the trip.

This was a practice run for a "BG" deployment. The amphib is filling in for the carrier until its ready.

I bet they also had something underwater with their group.
Posted by: Yosemite Sam   2015-09-03 12:16  

#1  IMO this is another pro-PLA, Chinese-led "show of strength" designed to occur in parallel wid its
military parade, wid message meant for the Bammer, Russia, + espec Japan.

Again, China ideally desires Japan + other US East Asia allies to give the US up + be on its side - the best thing Anti-US US OWG Globalist POTUS Obama = US can do ala China is to
NOT live up to its Security Treaty obligations to protect US Allies in the aftermath of any serious, de facto Chinese military escalation or attack.

Bammer + Globies aside, CHINA ideally would like to deter or avoid any direct US Military intervention ASAP AMAP ALAP - it may be able to do this by asymmetrically ocusing its efforts, actions + decisions agz US East Asia allies proper, NOT agz the US per se. LIMITED BUT DECISIVE WAR AGZ ONE OR MORE US ALLIES, NOT AGZ THE US, THUS SATISFYING US OWG GLOBALISTS.

CHINA STILL GETS ITS DESIRED 1/2 OF THE PACIFIC, THE OWG GLOBIES STILL GET THEIR OWG-NWO INTACT WID ITS STILL "WEAK/DECLINING" USA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2015-09-03 02:31  

00:00