You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Juan Williams: Politics, a sport of billionaires, who knew ?
2015-11-09
[The Hill] Tom Perkins, a Republican billionaire venture capitalist, once offered a "Hunger Games" take on money and American politics.

"You pay a million dollars in taxes, you get a million votes -- how's that?" Perkins proposed in a speech last year.

Perkins' words sound like a billionaire's fantasy unleashed about total political dominance of the lower 99.9 percent.

But that fantasy is close to the reality of the 2016 election cycle in which, The New York Times reports, just 158 families have given half of all the money donated to presidential candidates. All but 20 of those wealthy families have given their money to Republicans.

That fits with earlier findings that since 2010 only 195 "individuals and their spouses gave almost 60 percent" of the $1 billion channeled to super-PACs. Those numbers come from a report by the Brennan Center for Law & Justice in a review of the money gushing into politics since the Supreme Court ruled that unlimited contributions are to be protected as a matter of free speech.

Big dollars coming from super-PACs have doubled in Senate races since 2010, according to the Brennan Center. The group found that "of the 10 highest-spending super-PACs in the most competitive Senate races in 2014" only two got more than one percent of their contributions from individual donors who gave $200 or less.

At the moment, big money is also dominating the Republican presidential primary. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas had lagged in polls but has remained competitive largely due to the $11 million given to his super-PAC by one hedge fund manager, Robert Mercer.

Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor, is also failing to gain support from voters but he has raised more than $100 million for his super-PAC. The group began the year with a $100,000-per-ticket fundraiser hosted by Henry Kravis, a New York businessman.

And last week Sen. Marco Rubio's (Fla.) campaign, which is rising after a slow start, got a big shot in the arm because of an endorsement from billionaire investor Paul Singer. The 70-year-old topped all conservative donors in the 2014 midterm elections, and he is a top bundler of donations from other rich people. His support is so important to Republicans that Bush sent two top aides to Singer's office in a last-ditch effort to stop him from endorsing Rubio.
Posted by:Besoeker

#8  I thought the problem from the leftists point of view was that the rich do not pay taxes and use the system full of loopholes to avoid taxes.

One vote per dollar taxes paid would only encourage the dead to vote.
Posted by: Airandee   2015-11-09 19:18  

#7  ...well, the more you pile on 'soak the rich' the more they buy politicians to protect their riches, thus corrupting the entire process. Never figure that if you had something approaching a flat or three tier system minus any deductions (other than real children -18yo), they might ease off the buying and selling game. As far as the rich are concern the pols are just legal thieves and they're protecting their own interests like anyone else.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-11-09 15:44  

#6  I don't remember Juan (or anyone) reporting the number of billionaires that supported Obama. I suspect they is a lot of the same names as the rich see the way the wind is blowing and try to have the winning side 'owe' them.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-11-09 15:27  

#5  Left out of Mr. Williams'' calculation is "bundling." But that doesn't fit the class warfare narrative.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-11-09 15:03  

#4  OK Juan. The billionaires, who by and large, earned their dollars - are awful people because all but 20 of the families support Republicans. Amirite? The Unions, who take their money with mandatory dues from worker's paychecks (who may be Republicans - like me), almost 100% support Democrats. Who's the immoral assholes here, Juan?
Posted by: Frank G   2015-11-09 14:45  

#3  Odd... no mention of how much Unions give in direct $$$ and 'in-kind' contributions like phone banks, volunteers, etc...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2015-11-09 12:14  

#2  Yea, that Juan. Not the sharpest ho in the shed, but still a ho.
Posted by: Thrinesing de Medici4555   2015-11-09 11:28  

#1  Can you say Squirrel.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-11-09 10:15  

00:00