Since Hillary announced that her husband would be joining her on the campaign trail, people have been debating whether or not it's fair for the GOP to attack Bill's sexual misdeeds in order to indirectly attack her.
This makes sense. After all, we're talking about a guy who has been accused of the sexual assault of more than ten women. Think about it: How is her appointing him really any different than if she'd appointed Bill Cosby? But here's the thing: The real issue isn't whether or not to attack Bill to indirectly attack Hillary ‐ it's about directly attacking Hillary for how she herself treated the women involved.