You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
Trump Could Win It All
2016-01-10
[USNEWS] So if Donald Trump proved the political universe wrong and won the Republican presidential nomination, he would be creamed by Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as America's Blond Eminence and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Chateaubriand ...
, correct?

A new survey of likely voters might at least raise momentary dyspepsia for Democrats since it suggests why it wouldn't be a cakewalk.

The survey by Washington-based Mercury Analytics is a combination online questionnaire and "dial-test" of Trump's first big campaign ad among 916 self-proclaimed "likely voters" (this video shows the ad and the dial test results). It took place primarily Wednesday and Thursday and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percent.

Nearly 20 percent of likely Democratic voters say they'd cross sides and vote for Trump, while a small number, or 14 percent, of Republicans claim they'd vote for Clinton. When those groups were further broken down, a far higher percentage of the crossover Democrats contend they are "100 percent sure" of switching than the Republicans.
Posted by:Fred

#9  As Hugh Hewitt said a while back in one of his books:

"If we win big enough, they can't cheat" meaning if we really cream them, there is no way they can cheat enough to fill the gap without obvious and gross malfeasance of a kind that would be so blatant that it would not be successful.

I believe that if Hildabeast or Red Bernie is nominated, it will be a real splatter job one of those 49 state avalanches sends the media off to bed sucking their thumbs and wetting their beds.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2016-01-10 23:10  

#8  "Win it all" > I'm NOT so sure about that, as both GOP-DEMS in our mighty "Unitarian", Pro- SSSHHH ...CCCCCC Anti-US OWG-NWO Govt. still fear the threat of FILIBUSTER vee the opposition across the hall, hence a reason for "brokered convention" for one or both Major Parties in 2016.

THE MAHA-RUSHIAN QUESTIONNE' IS WHICH PARTY(S) IS WILLING TO RISK WORSE-THAN-OBAMA DIVIDED OR STALLED GOVT IN 2016 + BEYOND, ESPEC IN THE FACE OF INTENSIFYING GLOBAL JIHAD, OWG CO-SUPERPOWER-VS-CO-SUPERPOWER MIL CONFRONTATIONISM, + GENERAL [US/Globalist-supported?]ANTI-AMERICANISM ACROSS THE WORLD???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2016-01-10 20:09  

#7  What is the state by state party breakdown of Secretaries of state? How many Electoral Votes did Soros buy?
Posted by: Ebbomorong Ghibelline8855   2016-01-10 19:41  

#6  And how many times do they get counted until we get the result we want??
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2016-01-10 18:59  

#5  Who counts the votes?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-01-10 15:14  

#4  There is this poll out there in last day or so that says that Trump would cream Hillary like Nixon creamed Whatshisname back in 1972
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2016-01-10 13:58  

#3  Blah, blah.

No one who is really a Republican no matter how squishy can vote for Clinton. Not voting at all if Cruz wins? That I would believe, but voting for Clinton? No way.
Posted by: AlanC   2016-01-10 12:59  

#2  
Posted by: Lampedusa Creretch3679   2016-01-10 08:01  

#1  I suspect the Beest is feeling the heat. Why else would she enlist Slick's assistance. I was sure she'd keep him well at arm's length. It's obvious he has excessive baggage and caries with him the 'old age' factor. It will be quite interesting to see who her shadow running partner will be.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-01-10 04:02  

00:00