You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Napolitano on charges of destruction of CENTCOM intel: 'It is a big deal'
2016-02-26
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano told viewers Thursday on "Special Report with Bret Baier" that charges of personnel at U.S Central Command (CENTCOM) allegedly destroying evidence to minimize negative assessments of the administration’s fight against ISIS is "a big deal and I'm sorry to say I think it's going to go nowhere in the Obama administration."
Whatever gives you that idea? Actually, I would think that 0bean would want to prosecute this to the fullest extent so he can blame CENTCOM for his failures.
At an annual hearing on global threats facing the United States, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said, "We have been made aware that both files and emails have been deleted by personnel at CENTCOM, and we expect that the Department of Defense will provide these and all other relevant documents to the committee."
It would be nice to have backups, hopefully they will make an appearance one day. But doesn't destruction of evidence count heavily against the defendant?
Napolitano said the charges are unlikely to be pursued criminally for political reasons: "if the President's purpose, or the purpose of the people around him, was to shade intelligence with which the American people are familiar, in order to justify its behavior, they are not going to prosecute the people that did the shading."

"But there's only 11 months to go in his term, these are prosecutable events. The willful destruction of information, that the government requires be kept, particularly if they have reason to believe that this stuff is about to be subpoenaed by the Congress or any other subpoenaing authority. But don't look for anything other than political outrage and editorial outrage over this in the next 11 months," Napolitano said.
Posted by:gorb

#3  Just whose assets were being covered?

Theirs?

Or the CinC?
Posted by: AlanC   2016-02-26 10:00  

#2  Or someone just handed the next President Clinton the means to control a lot of those promoted during this reign.
Posted by: Glenmore   2016-02-26 09:24  

#1  If you kick a decorated soldier out for thumping a child rapist on an American compound, what do you do to those who willfully destroy government property (to cover their assets)? (Literally) time will tell. BTW, that falls under the UCMJ which means DoJ is not just on the hook, but the entire chain of command cause to have knowledge of and failure to act is conspiracy under the provisions of military law. Someone just handed the next Prez the means to clean house of a lot of those promoted during this reign.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-02-26 08:33  

00:00