Submit your comments on this article | ||||
Home Front: WoT | ||||
Iranian-"American" dodged Navy Intel, kept secret clearance while spying | ||||
2016-02-29 | ||||
![]()
An Iranian-American engineer, naturalized in 1985, gets a job with the Navy and holds a secret clearance. All the while he’s allegedly maintaining a sophisticated web of intermingled identities to shuffle money from foreign bank accounts, hold addresses in at least four states and lie about hisIranian passport. And elements of that scheme evaded detection for 30 years. James Robert Baker
Security experts said they were troubled by authorities' repeated failure to thoroughly investigate Baker, especially after red flags like his return to Iran only days after Navy officials told him to prove that he had turned it in. Facts about what motivated Baker's alleged three-decade ruse remain unclear, but several experts who reviewed the case said it bore hallmarks of espionage. “When you look at an individual in place for that many years under an assumed identity, it reeks of a foreign counter-intelligence operation,” said Fred Burton, a former State Department counter-terrorism agent and analyst for intelligence firm Stratfor. “It rings almost every alarm bell you’d look for. It’s an almost textbook espionage case.”
Baker's secret clearance gave him access to less sensitive information than that available to Chelsea Manning, the former Army intelligence analyst with top-secret access convicted for leaking reams of classified information to Wikileaks. But the fact that Baker was in the job for three decades opens the Navy to enormous damage if he was spying, Burton said. “It’s not just the information he had access to,” Burton said. “It's things he heard on work trips, around the water cooler, at lunch with co-workers: Human intelligence. We know those things aren’t supposed to go on but we all know they do.” Two facts jump out as classic spy moves, Burton said. The first is Baker’s sophisticated routing of $133,902 from foreign bank accounts to accounts set up under his four separate identities to conceal it. The other is his use of safe deposit boxes and post office boxes in no fewer than four states. Both are classic examples of spy fieldcraft, he said.
Experts were also in agreement that Baker, also known as Majid Karimi, should never have been granted a security clearance. One security law expert said it was strange that the Navy reinstated Baker's clearance even after learning that Baker had kept a Iranian passport that he used to travel to Iran. “I don’t understand how that wasn’t picked up as a red flag,” said Greg Rinckey, a partner with firm Tully Rinckey who works on security clearance cases. “This is exactly what you are concerned about when you are looking at security clearance adjudication: Foreign passports, foreign bank accounts that a foreign government could transfer money into. Why this didn’t happen is very concerning.” Chris Graham, an attorney at the Federal Practice Group who has worked as an administrative judge at the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals on clearance cases, agreed that the signs were missed. “Whoever was doing the security clearance investigations was asleep at the switch,” Graham said. Investigators, he said, have access to databases that with a name and a Social Security number could have busted the fraud years ago. Baker, who had a secret clearance for more than 30 years except for a one-year suspension in 2001 after his Iran trip, would have been investigated at least four times because secret clearances are re-investigated every 10 years. “Here’s a guy who legally changed his name in 1985,” Graham said. “Seems to me you run his old name to see if it’s still being used. Nobody was doing anything here but a cursory investigation.” | ||||
Posted by:Steve White |
#9 Pappy I have to hope somewhere I the bowels of the IC a tracking of ValJar has been kept for future reckoning. As sure as God made little green apples she's a traitor. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2016-02-29 12:50 |
#8 See if "Jarrett" shows up on his contact lists. |
Posted by: Pappy 2016-02-29 12:07 |
#7 When they asked me if I had ever belonged to a paramilitary organization, I said "Sure, I was in the Boy Scouts!" That didn't go well. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2016-02-29 08:39 |
#6 Besoeker: WRT Hasan: About a year after he cut loose, the Army announced it was going to investigate nine officers who--perhaps--had been in a position to stop Hasan's greased slide to Ft. Hood. So I suppose there were OER, letters for the file, etc. A couple of guys who had just demobbed said that won't get you anyplace. Nobody can afford to give a Muslim soldier anything but "perfect", and keep his own career. Now, you'd think we'd like to see moral courage anyway. Problem is, once a Muslim soldier gets something other than "perfect", he's a victim of Islamophobia and his Teflon gets another layer. |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2016-02-29 08:28 |
#5 “Whoever was doing the security clearance investigations was asleep at the switch,” Graham said. ...or did they receive a handsome performance award for 'spotting and assessing?" Been a while now, but I don't seem to recall any mention made of MAJ Nadal Hasan's last security clearance periodic update. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2016-02-29 07:08 |
#4 Back in the day, at Chattahoochee High, one of my platoon buddies was turned inside out by the FBI. His crime....? He'd been in a college choir which toured the USSR for a week. My father, in his turn at the Benning School for Boys, was investigated because the town in which his father "claimed" to have been born didn't exist. Simple, things were tough in upstate NY and the town went out of biz with the records going to the county. Not a bad gig for the FBI guys, what with the draft and Tarawa and the Bulge and all. Maybe this clown was so obvious everybody figured he couldn't be a spy being this obvious. Perhaps all the resources went to vetting the Tsarnaev clan. |
Posted by: Richard Aubrey 2016-02-29 06:48 |
#3 You can't fire a government employee. I bet he is still receiving a salary. |
Posted by: jvalentour 2016-02-29 06:45 |
#2 Well, at least he wasn't a Jewish dentist with contacts in Israel. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-02-29 03:11 |
#1 “I don’t understand how that wasn’t picked up as a red flag,” said Greg Rinckey, a partner with firm Tully Rinckey who works on security clearance cases. “This is exactly what you are concerned about when you are looking at security clearance adjudication: Foreign passports, foreign bank accounts that a foreign government could transfer money into. Why this didn’t happen is very concerning.” Why is happening? Please have a quick look at the Oval Office. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2016-02-29 02:30 |