You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Here's Exactly How The Military Could Lower Standards For Women In Combat
2016-03-28
[Daily Caller] Since Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced in December that all combat positions must open up to women across the services, military officials have insisted standards for mental and physical fitness will not lower to accommodate women, but countless experts and former military servicemembers consider all such promises to be little more than empty words.

Here's exactly how a shift in standards in the infantry and elite special operations could happen.
Posted by:Besoeker

#10  Iff one is wondering why the Madonna Fan from Guam sezzes the US in FutWar may send an All-Femme Sub to attack-n-destroy China's heavily defended Three Gorges, WEHELL WONDER NO MORE!

WELCOME TO US-LED ANTI-US OWG-NWO + US-LED ANTI-US GLOBALISM.

Perhaps youse 'hoid of it.

NO MORE "GREAT POWER" OR MAJOR WARS THUR YEAR 2050 IFF NOT 2100 = OWG UN PEACEKEEPING ACTIONS = WOMEN IN COMBAT, as the issue is being debated now.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2016-03-28 22:32  

#9  Physically women may be inferior to the average Joe but don't disrespect there abilities, intelligence and commitment.

Jus' Sayin'
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2016-03-28 19:29  

#8  Luckily the enemy will lower their standards too, just to be fair.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2016-03-28 19:10  

#7  They will kill a lot of women by doing this. Then they'll blame us.
Posted by: Iblis   2016-03-28 11:04  

#6  Everything is easy for those who can't do anything.
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2016-03-28 09:21  

#5  Tet or the Bulge - they're all suddenly soldiers. It happens. There's no time for training in the minors. Only Darwin on the playing field.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-03-28 09:10  

#4  The clerks and jerks not needing to be a combat proficient is a good theory but when the feces hit the fan that could be a big problem.

Just ask Charlie Wheeler and HHC 173 Light Infantry about clerks and jerks fighting like tigers on the first night of the 1968 Tet
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2016-03-28 09:06  

#3  I wonder if the US Military Academies will lower their standards on their football teams to allow woman to play on the gridiron. Oh, that’s right they play football to win, not to be equal!! We only fight wars these days to be equal…
Posted by: Joe of the Jungle   2016-03-28 09:05  

#2  Well, combat arms should only have one set of PT standards. I generally don't care about an individual catching the big one when the bullets and lead start flying but I do care that endangers everyone else in the team because that's one less to cover for everyone else. Yep, them support people work just as well in a mobile environment. (do I need to put a /sarc on the last one?)
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-03-28 08:18  

#1  Lowering standards has worked magnificently for non-combat jobs for decades. I'm sure it will work fine for everything else.

[sarc off]
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-03-28 07:00  

00:00