You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White Men Should Stop Running For Office, Colorado Group Says
2016-05-06
[CPR.ORG] A new political action committee has one question for straight white men with political aspirations.
"Dude, can you not?"

Democratic activists Jack Teter and Kyle Huelsman registered the organization last month. So far they've raised $120 from six donations.
It's a question embedded in the name of the organization. The Can You Not PAC plans to discourage straight white men from running for office in Colorado's diverse districts. The hope is that will clear the lane from female, minority and LGBTQ candidates.

Democratic activists Jack Teter and Kyle Huelsman registered the organization last month. So far they've raised $120 from six donations.

"It's the counterbalance to the classic intervention where people ask, 'Have you thought about ever running for office?', " says Huelsman. "We want to ask, 'Have you ever thought about not running for office?' "

In the short term, the pair plans to focus on Colorado districts that have large blocs of minority voters but tend to elect "traditional" candidates. That includes Aurora and parts of Denver.

Long term, they hope to tackle what they call a "crisis of overconfidence" among straight white men.
I may indeed be over-confident, but I'm not in crisis about it...
A 2004 study found that among professions that most generally produce candidates for elected office, more men than women feel they are qualified. Political scientists think that helps explain why U.S. legislatures are mostly male.

"We're pushing back against the notion that looking like a Ken doll makes you uniquely qualified to run for office," Huelsman said.

Teter added: "We know that men are more likely to look in the mirror in the morning and think, 'Wow, I'd be great at Congress.' Women need to be asked over and over by their communities."
Nothing is stopping them...
Teter said studies show that women and people of color tend to produce more progressive policies than liberal white males.

"So African American state legislatures are more likely to introduce measures that combat racial discrimination," he said. "That seems obvious. But they also produce measures improving education, healthcare, social welfare and the economy. If I support those policies, don't have an obligation to like the most-qualified person -- who evidence would suggest isn't a straight white man?"
Posted by:Fred

#11  White men should stop doing anything for one week.

I'm sure everything (plumbing, fire control, IT functions, high end medical care, the military etc.) would continue along fine without 'em!

BTW, Jack Teter is apparently a transi.

Kind of makes you wonder why it wanted to be a white male in the first place.
Posted by: charger   2016-05-06 19:09  

#10  I'm holding out for HeNeArKrXeRn candidates myself.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-05-06 18:35  

#9  White Men Should Stop Running For Office, Colorado Group Says

'Cause it worked so well for Zimbabwe and South Africa, of course.
Posted by: gorb   2016-05-06 17:02  

#8  Devolution in action. You're on your own, kiddies.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2016-05-06 16:38  

#7  How are they gonna pay for that when all they have is $120?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2016-05-06 16:05  

#6  I would need incentives for not running, say $500 and 5 lids of the Colorado good stuff.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-05-06 15:56  

#5  A 'group' consisting of two moonbats - ha ha ha ha !
Posted by: Raj   2016-05-06 12:13  

#4  I blame white male privilege. When are you going to earn it?

"So African American state legislatures are more likely to introduce measures that combat racial discrimination," he said. "That seems obvious.

Really? Who authored and passed the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments? Hint - it wasn't blacks or women of the time. I know its too hard - the answer white male Republicans.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-05-06 08:50  

#3  Never heard the expression "what goes around..."?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-05-06 01:24  

#2  So only approved sexism and racism can be in the dhimocrat party.

Makes sense. It is the party of Jim Crow after all.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-05-06 01:08  

#1  Of course, to a bigot, skin color, gender and/or sexualitydetermines politics. Not rationality, not Science!, not even emotionality. You skin color gender and sexual attraction are your destiny, you are an animal driven by those things, your mind has nothing to do with it.

That's where their arguments always end up putting those who espouse such politics. And yet these idiots havent a clue that is what they are advocating.
Posted by: Jomong Spawn of the Welsh2769   2016-05-06 00:12  

00:00