| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| Army shrinks to smallest level since before World War II |
| 2016-05-09 |
| [ARMYTIMES] The Army’s latest headcount shows that nearly 2,600 soldiers departed active service in March without being replaced, an action that plunges manning to its lowest level since before World War II. During the past year the size of the active force has been reduced by 16,548 soldiers, the rough equivalent of three brigades. Endstrength for March was 479,172 soldiers, which is 154 fewer troopers than were on active duty when the Army halted the post-Cold War drawdown in 1999 with 479,424 soldiers, the smallest force since 1940, when the active component numbered 269,023 soldiers. Barring unexpected delays, the Army is well-positioned to achieve, or exceed, its budgeted end-strength of 475,000 soldiers by Sept. 30, the end of fiscal 2016. Without congressional or Defense Department intervention, the drawdown will continue for two more years, with endstrength hitting 460,000 soldiers in 2017, and 450,000 in 2018. The latest official demographics from the Defense Manpower Data Center shows that in addition to the 479,172 soldiers who were on active duty April 1, the Army’s reserve forces totaled 548,024 soldiers, for a total force of 1,027,196 soldiers. The drawdown master plan calls for a Total Army of 980,000 soldiers on Sept. 30, 2018. DMDC statistics show that 348,463 soldiers were in service with the Army National Guard on April 1, and 199,561 with the Army Reserve. The active component total for the end of March includes 4,321 West Point cadets, which is 32 fewer than in February and 45 fewer than in January. The number of women serving on active duty April 1 stood at 69,171, a total that includes 15,654 officers, 52,698 enlisted soldiers and 819 West Point cadets. The female population of the Regular Army was reduced by 340 members in March. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #7 What #4 Darth said. |
| Posted by: Barbara 2016-05-09 20:33 |
| #6 As Instapundit often sez there is more opportunity for graft in the 1:4 ratio. |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2016-05-09 18:31 |
| #5 Roughly equivalent to three brigades equates to a division an infantry division. |
| Posted by: 49 pan 2016-05-09 18:22 |
| #4 Well it sure is a good thing we aren't involved in wars all over the globe and being the peacekeeper of the planet then! /sarc |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2016-05-09 10:38 |
| #3 ...The headline is slightly misleading - still almost twice the number of soldiers as pre-WWII - but bad enough. Worse when you remember that the 'tooth-to-tail' ratio (shooters vice support) was 1:3 in 2008; it's gotta be at 1:4 or worse now...which means that out of that 450,000 we'll have in 2018, 112,500 or so will be real shooters. It ain't enough. Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2016-05-09 05:43 |
| #2 "Thanks Obama" say all those who wish to see America taken down and dominated by outsiders. |
| Posted by: Snereque Gluling8027 2016-05-09 01:38 |
| #1 If only our welfare rolls shrank accordingly. |
| Posted by: Raj 2016-05-09 00:37 |