Submit your comments on this article |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
New York, Boston And D.C. Could Eventually Be One Gigantic City |
2016-06-17 |
![]() An estimated 66 percent of people will live in cities by 2050. And as the number of residents swell, urban boundaries will expand into the territory of other densely populated areas until entire regions coalesce into super-metropolises, author Parag Khanna posits in his new book Connectography. D.C. is already sucking the life out of the rest of the country. I'll be long gone by 2050, enjoy ! Khanna calls these areas "megacities." While that term is usually used to describe individual cities with populations over 10 million -- of which there are dozens around the world, including New York, Mexico City, Beijing and Mumbai -- Khanna writes that megacities shouldn’t just be defined by how many people they hold. He sees future megacities not as individual entities but as clusters linked by advanced infrastructure systems. These clusters, he says, would be major drivers of economic growth. "We should spend time building cities that are viable, connected and stable," Khanna told The Huffington Post. "It’s about improving livelihoods and infrastructure, and building a path to stability." In Connectography, which was published in April, Khanna says 40 of these interconnected megacities will form in the next decade, with many concentrated in fast-growing regions in Asia. In the map below, some of these potential megacities are marked by dotted lines. For instance, there’s "Abu-Dubai," a merging of the cities Abu Dhabi and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. In Japan, there’s "Tokyo-Osaka." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#13 #8 - AMEN |
Posted by: Frank G 2016-06-17 22:05 |
#12 And like Singapore, should be made an independent city state. |
Posted by: P2Kontheroad 2016-06-17 20:41 |
#11 #5 Mega City 1. Now all we need is Judge Fixed. |
Posted by: charger 2016-06-17 17:35 |
#10 New York, Boston And D.C. Could Eventually Be One Gigantic |
Posted by: Skidmark 2016-06-17 15:16 |
#9 Deaths now exceed births in Japan. The outer villages are emptying. What population will move into a Tokyo-Osaka megacity? New York City's growth fell last year to 0.6%, while the population of the rest of the state fell. And like Japan, the state's population is aging. I don't think New York City will be contributing much longer to this future Boston-Baltimore megacity corridor. But it's a pretty projection, one that dates back to the 1970s. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2016-06-17 14:01 |
#8 And in San Diego we all thank the Marines for holding onto Camp Pendleton because it's such a wonderful buffer between us and Los Angeles. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-06-17 12:01 |
#7 Don't forget Baltimore. Khanna paints a nice picture but, unless there are jobs for all the people who live in these cities they, the reality will be more like megaslums. There has to be more to attract people to these urban areas than subsidized housing, readily available heroin and EBT cards. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-06-17 11:59 |
#6 I'd rather have Elijah Baley. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-06-17 11:51 |
#5 Mega City 1. Now all we need is Judge Dredd. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2016-06-17 11:22 |
#4 I thought it already was one, called "BosWash." Or maybe its real name is Babylon. |
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2016-06-17 11:18 |
#3 And they attract *lots* of non-productive people. Can we wall them off (with an option to fill it with water later)? |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2016-06-17 11:10 |
#2 Target to big to miss. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2016-06-17 10:06 |
#1 Mega cities suck the resources out of everywhere else. They are not sustainable. They are vulnerable to the loss of water, electricity, and sanitation. Lose water for 3 days and the city will have to be evacuated. Think about it. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2016-06-17 10:03 |