You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
State Officials Trash Obama's Syria "Policy"
2016-06-18
Hat tip to the Dallas Morning News. Several sites found in a search, but I selected the Slimes for its' well-known even-handed fairness in the support of the administration.
More than 50 State Department diplomats have signed an internal memo sharply critical of the Obama administration's policy in Syria, urging the United States to carry out military strikes against the government of President Bashar al-Assad to stop its persistent violations of a cease-fire in the country's five-year-old civil war.

The memo, a draft of which was provided to The New York Times by a State Department official, says American policy has been "overwhelmed" by the unrelenting violence in Syria. It calls for "a judicious use of stand-off and air weapons, which would undergird and drive a more focused and hard-nosed U.S.-led diplomatic process."
Sort of like bombing North Viet Nam in the 60s.
The names on the memo are almost all midlevel officials ‐ many of them career diplomats ‐ who have been involved in the administration's Syria policy over the last five years, at home or abroad.

While there are no Champ appointees widely recognized names, higher-level State Department officials are known to share their concerns. Mr. Kerry himself has pushed for more red lines stronger American action against Syria, in part to force a diplomatic solution on Mr. Assad. The president has resisted such pressure, and has been backed up by his military commanders, who have raised questions about what would happen in the event that Mr. Assad was forced from power ‐ a scenario that the draft memo does not address.
Scenario - Libya or Iraq? Maybe Somalia? Maybe Yugoslavia.
Posted by:Bobby

#2  Too late to bomb Assad, with Russia there now.
Posted by: phil_b   2016-06-18 20:22  

#1  I'm confused about what these people want. Do they want a war with Russia? Do they want ISIS to take over all of Syria? Do they want more Syrian refugeescolonists in Europe and America? Do they want a full on fucking ground war involving US troops in Syria?

Because those are the options. If they think they're going to get a Western style democracy in Syria they are hallucinating very badly.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2016-06-18 12:36  

00:00