Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Krauthammer: Trump's Email 'Trap' Catches Hillary in 'Complete Contradiction' |
2016-07-28 |
"This has to be the first time that a major presidential candidate has actively encouraged a foreign power to conduct espionage against his political opponent," senior policy advisor Jake Sullivan said. "That’s not hyperbole, those are just the facts. This has gone from being a matter of curiosity, and a matter of politics, to being a national security issue." Charles Krauthammer said on "Special Report" tonight that Trump set a trap, and the Clinton campaign fell right into it. He explained that the Clinton campaign statement said it would be a "national security issue," which contradicts Clinton's repeated asserted that the missing 33,000 emails were all of a personal nature, not work-related. "If that's what's really in the 33,000 emails, then there's no national security to be involved at all," Krauthammer said. "So the Clinton campaign ends up admitting that perhaps there really is work-related - if not classified - stuff on the emails which she deleted." Krauthammer said that could be grounds for a charge of obstruction, declaring that the Clinton campaign has been caught in a "complete contradiction." |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#12 Remember Honduras Coup when her lines were contrary to Barry's - she always goes with the highest bidder. That would get expensive, having to out-bid Europe and Saudi Arabia at every decision. If it was Russia. I still have most of my chips on Inside Job. As for her time at SoS, remember the tapped conversation between US and Ukraine deriding the sloth of EU decision and action. Yeah, they have them. Question is how many copies were sold. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2016-07-28 16:14 |
#11 magpie, it depends on how much Putin offers her. Err, I mean the Clinton Foundation. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2016-07-28 14:46 |
#10 Sunk Costs Logic Error: investing more money on a questionable investment. Putin may have bribed her, but that was then and this is now. Does anybody think that HRC (Her Royal Clinton-ness) will stay bought? |
Posted by: magpie 2016-07-28 14:40 |
#9 Both parties are filled with professors and students from Miskatonic University - so of course the Old Gods and Chaos have undue influence. |
Posted by: 3dc 2016-07-28 14:06 |
#8 Who thinks DEM rabble actually understands any of this? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2016-07-28 13:07 |
#7 g(r)om - Putin expects bought politicians to stay bought. Wet jobs are just a wee bit touchy at this time. P2k lets do Socratic method. Who was POTUS (Pub or Dem) when USA attacked Serbia? Who was POTUS when USA engineered anti-Russian coup in Ukraine? Who builds NATO bases in Russia front yard? Who always talking about spreading "democracy" & "human rights" by force if necessary? And who wants to make deals, and restore USA industry --- thereby weakening China? Last, but not least, whom Russians consider a sociopathic, megalomaniac bitch who should not be trusted with the red button? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-07-28 12:26 |
#6 Reductio ad absurdum example supreme, A and not A. HEY, THEY SAID THEIR'D BE NO LOGIC ON THIS TEST!!!! |
Posted by: AlanC 2016-07-28 11:42 |
#5 g(r)om - Putin expects bought politicians to stay bought. Wet jobs are just a wee bit touchy at this time. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-07-28 09:58 |
#4 It was a troll move by Trump. He is very good at it and the Clinton campaign came out smeared with extra shit. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2016-07-28 09:11 |
#3 Why would Vlad want to caught |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-07-28 08:25 |
#2 More like a greased pig. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2016-07-28 08:22 |
#1 Catching a Clinton is like catching a greased watermelon. |
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2016-07-28 08:02 |