Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Huma Abedin Denies Active Role as Editor of Radical Muslim Journal |
2016-08-22 |
![]() Paul Sperry writes in the New York Post on the statement from Hillary Clinton's campaign regarding the work her close aide Huma Abedin did as an editor of a radical Muslim journal of which Abedin's mother is the editor-in-chief. Top Hillary Clinton confidante Huma Abedin played no formal role in a radical Muslim journal -- even though she was listed as an editor on the hate-filled periodical's masthead for a dozen years, a campaign rep claimed Sunday. "My understanding is that her name was simply listed on the masthead in that period," Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said hours after The Post broke the bombshell story. "She did not play a role in editing at the publication." My weasel-word sense is tingling . . . . Merrill said Abedin was just a figurehead and not actually on staff at the Saudi-based and -funded Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs, which featured radically anti-feminist views and backed strict Islamic laws roundly criticized for oppressing women. And 0bean had no idea that Reverend Wright was spewing hate speech either. Even though he had been "attending" his "church" for 20 years. A journalism major at George Washington University, Abedin, 40, was listed as "assistant editor" of the journal from 1996 to 2008, when her name was removed from the staff box and she went to work for Clinton at the State Department. Her brother, who was an associate editor, and a sister, also employed as an assistant editor, are listed as staff members. Abedin's Pakistani mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, remains editor-in-chief. Read the rest here. Read Sperry's original article on Abedin's work at the journal here. |
Posted by:gorb |
#11 Nothing to see here! Say, did you hear about young Trump pulling pigtails?! |
Posted by: MSM 2016-08-22 22:12 |
#10 Being married to these two makes the sleazy behavior of their husbands seem quite reasonable. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2016-08-22 20:48 |
#9 Thundering hooves? Not zebras. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2016-08-22 20:46 |
#8 It's a rabbit, trust me. |
Posted by: Shipman 2016-08-22 18:55 |
#7 When I was young, my father used to tell me: " if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, swims like a duck and looks like a duck, it might be a rabbit but it's probably a duck" At some point with Huma, Hilda, Bill and whole Clinton gaggle are grifting, dishonest, corrupt and criminals, and have played the reasonable doubt card down to tattered, laughable shreds. They are exactly as corrupt and dishonest and craven as they appear to be! |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2016-08-22 18:32 |
#6 She was on the payroll. If she did not edit, then she was there for her ability to influence her Flashing pervert husband. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2016-08-22 17:15 |
#5 So she allowed her name to be used? Or is she saying someone else wrote the articles in question? |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-08-22 17:09 |
#4 So Huma was something like an agitprop secretary, serving an anti-Western totalitarian ideology? Trump's characterization was inexact. Hillary isn't an American Merkel. Merkel is a German Hillary&Huma combined. |
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660 2016-08-22 16:48 |
#3 Probably the salary was just a way to pay her for being agent of influence. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2016-08-22 15:45 |
#2 I seem to remember someone close the Hillary and Huma debating the meaning of "is". Now who could that have been? |
Posted by: AlanC 2016-08-22 15:24 |
#1 You can bet she was regularly paid with Gulf Arab Money. A No-show job for 12 years? |
Posted by: Frank G 2016-08-22 15:15 |