You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
EU orders British press NOT to reveal when terrorists are Muslims
2016-10-06
MEDDLING Brussels has said the British press should not report when terrorists are Muslims in a slew of demands to the Government to crack down on the media. A report from the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) found there was an increase in hate speech and racist violence in the UK from 2009 to March 2016.

Blaming the press, ECRI Chair Christian Ahlund, said: “It is no coincidence that racist violence is on the rise in the UK at the same time as we see worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in the newspapers, online and even among politicians.”

The report makes a whopping 23 recommendations to Theresa May’s Government for changes to criminal law, the freedom of the press, crime reporting and equality law.

And despite the report not analysing coverage of the historic Brexit vote, Mr Ahlund saw fit to comment on the UK's decision to leave the EU. In a sweeping statement, he said: “The Brexit referendum seems to have led to a further rise in ‘anti-foreigner’ sentiment, making it even more important that the British authorities take the steps outlined in our report as a matter of priority.”

The report lays into the British press and urges the government to “give more rigorous training” to reporters.
Send them to the New York Times?
In the 83-page report, the Commission said: “ECRI considers that, in light of the fact that Muslims are increasingly under the spotlight as a result of recent ISIS-related terrorist acts around the world, fuelling prejudice against Muslims shows a reckless disregard, not only for the dignity of the great majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom, but also for their safety.
Not every act of terrorism is committed by a Muslim. But when such an act is committed by a Muslim, isn't is proper to note that? When Eric Rudolph was murdering abortion doctors, everyone knew he was a Christian...
“In this context, it draws attention to a recent study by Teeside University suggesting that where the media stress the Muslim background of perpetrators of terrorist acts, and devote significant coverage to it, the violent backlash against Muslims is likely to be greater than in cases where the perpetrators’ motivation is downplayed or rejected in favour of alternative explanations.”

Despite the creation of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) in 2014 as an independent regulator for newspapers and magazines,
I see your first problem right there...
the “ECRI strongly recommends that the authorities find a way to establish an independent press regulator according to the recommendations set out in the Leveson Report. It recommends more rigorous training for journalists to ensure better compliance with ethical standards.”
Whose ethical standards?
But as Britain prepares to leave the crumbling bloc, the Government waded in to defend freedom of expression. In a written statement to the ECRI, the Government said: “The Government is committed to a free and open press and does not interfere with what the press does and does not publish, as long as the press abides by the law.”
Our law, not yours, so sod off, as they say in British-English...
ECRI is a human rights body of the Council of Europe, composed of independent experts, which monitors problems of racism, xenophobia, antisemitism, intolerance and racial discrimination.
And they monitor problems in a certain way...
The group writes reports on every member state every five years and says the documents are “analyses based on a great deal of information gathered from a wide variety of sources.

In a statement, ECRI said: “ECRI welcomed, among other things, the entry into force of the Equality Act 2010 and the generally strong legislation against racism and racial discrimination in the country, as well as the government’s new hate crime action plan and substantial efforts to promote LGBT rights in the UK which have led to a significant change in attitudes.

“At the same time, the commission noted considerable intolerant political discourse in the UK, particularly focusing on immigration. It said that hate speech continues to be a serious problem in tabloid newspapers, and that online hate speech targeting Muslims in particular has soared since 2013.”
Posted by:Steve White

#8  They are taking lessons from 1984 and Animal Farm.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-10-06 11:57  

#7  Coming to the now internationally controlled internet near you!
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-10-06 09:34  

#6  American media is already doing the same, with no orders from Brussels. Have been for years.
When a crime is reported, if the perp is white, they will report it. If the perp is non-white there will be no mention of his description.
Posted by: jvalentour   2016-10-06 08:30  

#5  Will Islam thank us?

If you won't learn to fight, you better learn to suck.
Posted by: Glase Bluetooth5522   2016-10-06 07:28  

#4  Not always true, but it's the way to bet.
Posted by: Shipman   2016-10-06 05:16  

#3  European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI)

Yawl afraid of pissing off Alah, eh?

Posted by: Omase Big Foot1083   2016-10-06 05:12  

#2  Don't know about you, but - unless told otherwise - I always assume a perp of a terr-act is an adherent of Religion of Peace. Ditto for sexual molestation.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-10-06 04:41  

#1  I hope Ms. May told the EU wonks to go fuck themselves...
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2016-10-06 00:09  

00:00