You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Make America Boom Again: How to Bring Back Supersonic Transport
2016-10-30
An aircraft flying roughly twice the speed of sound could take off in New York City and land in Los Angeles in just two hours. The technology to travel at this speed exists, but in 1973 the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a complete ban on civil supersonic aviation over all US land and territorial waters, a ban that remains in effect to this day.

The issue is noise. As an airplane reaches the speed of sound (Mach 1 or 660 mph at high altitude, air waves produced at the plane's nose are compressed, generating a shock wave that is known as a sonic boom because of the explosive noise it creates in the planes wake.

The Concorde, the supersonic passenger jet developed in the 1960s by the United Kingdom and France, for example, produced a sonic boom as loud as 135 decibels when it reached land, comparable to the noise level 100 feet from a jet engine. Many decades have passed since the Concorde's milestone transatlantic flight in 1969.

A new generation of supersonic plane designs takes advantage of 50 years of advances in materials science, aerospace engineering, and computer simulation techniques to substantially reduce the loudness of the sonic boom.

In 2012, for example, a team of NASA-funded researchers reported results from wind tunnel tests in which scale model aircraft produced sonic booms perceived to be as quiet as 79 decibels, similar to the noise created by a car passing 10 feet away.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#7  If the NFL is going to continue playing games in England...

.
Posted by: OregonGuy   2016-10-30 16:59  

#6  Had a stopover at JFK on my way to a taxpayer-funded adventure in the early 70's and watched a Concorde take off. Not quite the Vulcan, but beautiful nonetheless.
Posted by: Blossom Unains5562   2016-10-30 12:09  

#5  ...and usually the complaints came from neighborhoods that grew up around the airports which were originally on the outskirts of those same cities decades ago.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-10-30 11:02  

#4  back in 70s, the worst problem was the noise at take off, not the sonic boom
Posted by: lord garth   2016-10-30 10:02  

#3  I'm wondering how you achieve Mach2 in a wind tunnel. Must be a very long one.
Posted by: phil_b   2016-10-30 02:50  

#2  [envy envy envy]

In other news, some scientists now say that your flying car may run whisper quiet! Here with the details is our own April Showers...
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2016-10-30 01:14  

#1  I was at Gatwick when the Concord took off on its last flight. I suppose the guys punched it, but it was magnificent. Standing in the parking lot I was stunned by the shock wave, then deafened by every car alarm it set off.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-10-30 00:58  

00:00