You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
SF in ISIS fight frustrated by top brass drone micromanagement
2016-12-05
[Wash Times] The secretive teams of Green Berets guiding rebels in northeast Syria have expressed frustration with the amount of micromanagement they receive from a top-heavy headquarters in Iraq and the United States.

Special Forces sources tell of support staff watching the free-spirited Green Berets on reconnaissance aircraft and then criticizing their performance as they conduct the mission officially described as "train, advise and assist" the multi-ethnic Syrian Democratic Forces. The Americans and SDF are fighting their way toward Raqqa, the Islamic State terrorist army’s home base in Syria. Some of the "assisting" has drawn the Americans into firefights.

One officer chalked up the complaints to the sensitive political situation of U.S. troops on the ground in a chaotic country amid competing groups of Arab, Kurdish and Turkish forces, all converging with different objectives. The Green Berets, known officially as Army Special Forces, must act under strict combat rules after President Obama approved their insertion one year ago.

"Based on the very high-level approval required to conduct operations, it can be extremely frustrating for the teams," the officer told The Washington Times. "We just don’t have the latitude we had during our years in Iraq, and that can be frustrating for the teams. The progress over the last year has been slow. Each team may not see it during their rotation, but cumulatively we’ve made significant progress against Daesh while maintaining relationships with Turkey and Jordan. In my many years in Special Forces, I’ve never been involved with a more complex mission."

The Islamic State is also called Daesh, ISIL and ISIS.
Posted by:Besoeker

#10  Think: a platoon of Lindsay Graham JAGS poised to make a career jump on your dead career
Posted by: Frank G   2016-12-05 21:37  

#9  The downside of enhanced communications. The bosses want to communicate.
Posted by: Jomort Ulavigum1021   2016-12-05 17:14  

#8  I hate playing Mother May I?
Can only imagine the frustration.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-12-05 17:00  

#7  When every decision, including those to fire or not, need to be run up the chain in Washington, nothing much gets done.

Posted by: DarthVader   2016-12-05 13:09  

#6  Or maybe bring back a bunch of O-5 and O-6 that were forced out by the empty suit's perfumed warriors in the Pentagon...A lot of fine soldiers and great leaders with initiative and guts are drawing retirement checks that would love to get back in it.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2016-12-05 11:53  

#5  Eight years of this has bred an entire cohort of officers and senior NCOs who see careers advanced or ended by the mother-may-I syndrome. It takes years to wash out or ruthless culling. Given the new secdef, I'm thinking the latter. A new crop of 04 and 05 need to be brought up quickly.
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2016-12-05 10:23  

#4  micromanagement = inbred institutional hesitation = frustration and casualties for the good guys

The formula never changes. It really sucks too - even when the micromanagement is finally removed, the hesitation lingers.

Posted by: Tennessee   2016-12-05 09:39  

#3  Helicopter Hover factor, Vietnam Era

The desperate need to impose power and control. It then creates a mother-may-I environment. Too many things happen too fast on a battlefield to have one 'brain' handle it all. Then the enemy is able to exploit that overload. Time and again demonstrated at the NTC in the 80s. We're back.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2016-12-05 08:52  

#2  Never served so much as a minute in the military. And any of you who served should be happy about that. I respect the hell out of you that did, but, I've had an anti-authoritarian streak a mile wide since I was 2 and it would not have worked out well.

That said, I remember hearing about this kind of $hit in Viet Nam and also I heard about the institution of fragging. How bad does it have to get before the controllers "feel their pain"? Wasn't that one of LBJ's problems?
Posted by: AlanC   2016-12-05 08:08  

#1  My guess is the aerial 'drone management' is conducted by neither clueless politicians nor senior military brass. But that's just a guess.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-12-05 05:54  

00:00