You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
US Military Develops 'Multi-Object Kill Vehicle' to Blast Enemy Nukes
2016-12-05
Defensive weapons that can intercept and destroy enemy missiles before they can harm the United States or its allies have been a key part of military strategy for decades, but the rules of the game are changing.

More countries have or are developing long-range missile technology, including systems that can carry multiple warheads, known as Multiple Independently Targetable Re-entry Vehicles (MIRVs) and/or decoys.

"Both China and Russia possess the MIRV capability for their ballistic missiles. In 2014, reports confirmed that Iran too had developed Multiple Re-entry Vehicles (MRVs) for their ballistic missiles. Cold War literature suggests that MIRVs are first strike weapons and could be strategically destabilizing," independent consultant Debalina Ghoshal wrote in a June 2016 report for the Federation of American Scientists.

"The United States realizes these threats and is working towards a robust missile defense system," she said.

Last year, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency awarded contracts to Raytheon, Lockheed-Martin and Boeing to begin designing what is known as a "Multi-Object Kill Vehicle" or MOKV, which could destroy several objects in space with a single launch.

"Ten years ago, we had a single kill vehicle on a single interceptor. Kill vehicles today are the size of a toaster ... This MOKV program is the latest iteration," John Pike, director of GlobalSecurity.org, told Seeker.

Raytheon's plan, which is scheduled for a concept review in December, is to load multiple MOKVs onto a single missile for launch. Each MOKV would be outfitted with sensors, a steering and propulsion system and communications equipment that will allow them to zero in on an individual target and hit it, destroying the object by sheer kinetic forces.

The impacts would take place beyond Earth's atmosphere, but on a trajectory that would send the resulting cloud of debris back into the atmosphere, where it burn up, Pike said.

A major technological challenge is figuring out how to differentiate between bombs and decoys, such as balloons that look like they might have a hydrogen bomb aboard.

The military hopes to begin proof-of-concept demonstrations late next year and a non-intercept flight test in 2018. If successful, the Missile Defense Agency would conduct an intercept test in 2019.
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562

#5  ...Next time somebody brings up the smuggled nuke idea, ask 'em why it hasn't happened yet.

There's a reason.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2016-12-05 13:39  

#4  "Your missile defense system won't do anything to stop a smuggled in nuke!"

Then we beef up the border security... They'll so want that won't they?
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2016-12-05 12:57  

#3  Leftists like to say "It's like trying to hit a bullet with a bullet - it's just not possible." But it has been done repeatedly. Leftists then say "Your missile defense system won't do anything to stop a smuggled in nuke!" This is about like saying "Your cancer cure does nothing for the common cold, and therefore is useless." Lefty pretzel logic over and over. No wonder they ran a candidate that a wild-card like Trump could beat...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2016-12-05 11:01  

#2  Now that Obozo is on the way out, no more sham reports about the tech not workable.
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839   2016-12-05 10:02  

#1  Reagan is spinning.
The 'Star Wars' program is alive again.
Posted by: Skidmark   2016-12-05 09:39  

00:00