You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Navy, Trump planning biggest fleet expansion since Cold War
2017-01-09
With President-elect Donald Trump demanding more ships, the Navy is proposing the biggest shipbuilding boom since the end of the Cold War to meet threats from a resurgent Russia and saber-rattling China.

The Navy's 355-ship proposal released last month is even larger than what the Republican Trump had promoted on the campaign trail, providing a potential boost to shipyards that have struggled because budget caps that have limited money funding for ships.

Boosting shipbuilding to meet the Navy's 355-ship goal could require an additional $5 billion to $5.5 billion in annual spending in the Navy's 30-year projection, according to an estimate by naval analyst Ronald O'Rourke at the Congressional Research Service.

The Navy's revised Force Structure Assessment calls for adding another 47 ships including an aircraft carrier built in Virginia, 16 large surface warships built in Maine and Mississippi, and 18 attack submarines built in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Virginia. It also calls for more amphibious assault ships, expeditionary transfer docks and support ships.

In addition to being good for national security, a larger fleet would be better for both the sailors, who'd enjoy shorter deployments, and for the ships, which would have more down time for maintenance, said Matthew Paxton, president of the Shipbuilders Council of America, which represents most of the major Navy shipbuilders.

"Russia and China are going to continue to build up their navies," he said. "The complexities aren't going to get any easier. The Navy, more than any of the services, is our forward presence. We're going to need this Navy."

Many defense analysts agree that military capabilities have been degraded in recent years, especially when it comes to warships, aircraft and tanks.

The key is finding a way to increase Navy shipbuilding to achieve defense and economic gains "in a fiscally responsible way that does not pass the bill along to our children," said independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, a member of the Armed Services Committee.

Even when Trump takes office, no one envisions a return to the heady days during the Cold War when workers were wiring, welding, grinding, pounding and plumbing ships at a furious pace to meet President Ronald Reagan's audacious goal of a 600 ship Navy.

The Navy currently has 274 deployable battle force ships, far short of its old goal of 308 ships.

Lawrence J. Korb, a retired naval officer and former assistant defense secretary under Reagan, said the Navy's request isn't realistic unless the Trump administration is willing to take the budget "to levels we've never seen."
As in, an extra $5 billion a year Mr. Korb? We're spending $4.5 trillion a year, a fair bit of which goes for stupid stuff. I think we can do a little more for defense.
"You never have enough money to buy a perfect defense. You have to make trade-offs," said Korb, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
Wow -- yahoo and AP actually identified his affiliation?
But investors apparently are betting on more ships. General Dynamics, which owns Bath Iron Works, Connecticut-based Electric Boat and California-based NASSCO, and Huntington Ingalls, which owns major shipyards in Virginia and in Mississippi, have both seen stock prices creep upward since the election.
I do think we need investment in our military. But the Navy had better learn the lessons of the LCS, the F-35 and the DDX programs, or all that new money is going to be peed away.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Yes WM, the Burke class is the current configuration of DDGs. There is very little similarity between the WWII classes of DD and today's DDGs (size, staffing, weaponry, etc.)
Posted by: GORT   2017-01-09 16:35  

#8  Is the Burke the current go-to destroyer? I was looking over its specs and the WWII Mahan specs, big differences.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2017-01-09 15:41  

#7  Yay PTAH! Go NAVY!
Posted by: USN, Ret   2017-01-09 14:55  

#6  Congrats, Ptah!
Posted by: Frank G   2017-01-09 14:29  

#5  Congrats on your son at GL ptah. My sailor is on a DDG as a missile tech/gunnersmate.

He tells me, "Don't worry Dad, I'm allowed to shoot back."

Our boys are doing us proud.

Posted by: GORT   2017-01-09 14:15  

#4  Plan and execution will split as cost overruns and delays eat up available funds. See - Littoral ship. Until the procurement culture is keel hauled and the pursuit of the next best promising technology is throttled too many contracts will become money pits.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-01-09 11:25  

#3  Congratulations, ptah! Your son comes from good stock. So long as young men and women such as he continue to think this country is worth stepping forward to protect, despite the almost-previous president's egregious nonsense, we'll be ok.
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-01-09 10:04  

#2  Sounds like a young man with a plan. I've added him to my prayer list.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-01-09 10:02  

#1  #1 son is now in Week 5 of Naval Boot camp in Michigan, hoping to get into nuclear power school in February and serve on a CVN. Still praying for him, as well as thanking God for Trump.
Posted by: ptah   2017-01-09 09:50  

00:00