You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
The Travel Ban Endangers Special Operations Forces
2017-02-04
[Task & Purpose] Last year, retired Army Gen. David Petraeus ominously predicted that the divisive anti-Muslim rhetoric during the presidential election would not fade and would make our country less safe. This warning came to pass last week as President Donald Trump’s travel ban took effect on Friday afternoon and created the chaos across America’s major airports.

The immediate outcry was predictable and justified. It doesn’t require Petraeus’ experience to realize that labeling all citizens of certain Muslim countries as suspects helps jihadists recruit new members by pitching their struggle as a religious war between Islam and the West.

But what I fear more than the way this order aids groups like ISIS and al Qaeda are the short-term risks for our forces on the ground. Treating all citizens of Muslim nations like potential terrorists alienates our Muslim allies who are fighting terrorists with America today. Nowhere are these effects so palpable than with the special operations forces around the globe who interact with these allies on a day-to-day basis.

To understand these impacts of Trump’s order, it’s helpful to understand how special operations are conducted. The large majority of special operations involve working with a partner force that creates something we call a "force multiplier." For example, a small group of special operators will deploy to an austere environment far away from U.S. forces to equip and train locals to be better and more effective fighters. Doing so, this small team of 12 or fewer Americans "multiplies" their impact by creating seasoned fighters out of hundreds or thousands of local nationals. The enemy, instead of facing a small team of highly capable Americans, faces a much larger group with well-trained and equipped fighters using local intelligence.

Strategically, this yields a better return on investment for the U.S. military. For every special operations-trained team deployed, there are thousands of conventional forces that America isn’t putting at risk to accomplish the same goal. Simultaneously, this is the exit plan: By training partner forces to proficiency, we won’t need to help them one day.

When I was in Afghanistan, I was part of one of these units that trained, mentored, and led an elite unit of Afghan commandos on combat missions. We would spend weeks training hundreds of commandos to proficiency and then fought arm-in-arm with them on raids against Taliban insurgencies in the deserts and mountains of Afghanistan.
Posted by:Besoeker

#6  Hate to break the news to you Devil Dog but our FID missions in IRQ and AFG have been total failures. 100's of SF lives and 100's of millions of dollars - failure. IRQ is lost and AFG is Vietnam in late 71 early 72 - just waiting for the Easter Offensive. We f'd up both places and we just don't have the sense or balls to own up it.
Posted by: Bangkok Billy   2017-02-04 23:24  

#5  A kind of Bizarro-Finlandization apparently is now a mainstream Western political doctrine.

We are witnessing a process by which a group of weak and failed countries strongly influences the policies of a a group of prosperous and overwhelmingly powerful countries, while allowing them to nominally keep their independence and political system.

Why shouldn't e.g. Russia and China conclude that the West has gone mad?
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660   2017-02-04 23:07  

#4  Stop calling them violent or they'll kill us!
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-02-04 12:29  

#3  Good thing these people weren't around in WW2.

"We must cancel the Doolittle raid! It will only make the Japs want to bomb us some more!"
Posted by: charger   2017-02-04 10:42  

#2  Maybe we should stop training our enemies and then letting them into the US.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2017-02-04 09:33  

#1  We've been conducting Foreign Internal Defense (FID) missions and training indigenous forces in Iraq and Afghanistan for how many years....and suddenly Donald Trump is now responsible for continuing mission (host nation) failure and the death of a SEAL operator in Yemen ?

Total rubbish.

An 'ominous' Petraeus quote lead-in, absolutely priceless.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-02-04 09:01  

00:00