You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Liberals in Global Outrage That Professional Attire Is Expected at the White House
2017-02-06
[FREEBEACON] Liberals are outraged across the globe because employees are expected to dress professionally in the White House.

Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
has "angered feminists all over again," this time for comments he did not make. The outrage originated from an Axios report Thursday that quoted an unnamed source who claimed to have worked for the Trump campaign who said, "Trump likes the women who work for him ’to dress like women.'"

"Even if you're in jeans, you need to look neat and orderly," the source added. Men also should be "sharply dressed."

Dozens of outlets from Australia to Ireland celebrated women who took to Twitter to express their displeasure with Trump over the anonymous comment that women can wear jeans to work. Users began using the hash tag #DressLikeAWoman to show that many women wear uniforms at their jobs, as do fictional characters.

"Trump prefers female employees to ’dress like women', because of course he does," wrote the Sydney Morning Herald.

The Irish Examiner said the "internet's response" to the report was "gloriously badass." The Indian Express and Refinery 29 noted the "amazing Twitter responses." The Huffington Post found 21 women who tweeted about the comments.

BBC News, TIME, the Telegraph, the Guardian, and Yahoo! had write ups, as well.

The UK edition of Marie Claire magazine used the occasion to incorrectly report that President Trump will "declare pre-marital sex" "wrong" via an executive order.

"[I]n just two weeks he has already set back women’s rights dramatically," the magazine wrote. "He has restricted women’s reproductive rights, cut funding to international organizations who promote, provide and advise on abortions, and just yesterday it was revealed that he’s planning an executive order to declare pre-marital sex, same-sex marriage and abortion to be wrong."

The magazine said the comment on women's clothing, which they wrongly attributed to Trump directly, made Marie Claire "disheartened," because it had the effect of "cementing a general feeling that a Trump presidency is setting us back by about 50 years."

Posted by:Fred

#6  The democrats don't seem to realize that the biggest voting block out there is the independent voters.

The more of this crap they throw around and the more they act like spoiled brats and entitled little sissies, the more of the independents they alienate.

We are watching the end of the democratic party and the marginalization of PC progressive social engineering.

Where will the SJW's go when they have no party and we find a way to put Soros and his minions in jail?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2017-02-06 16:20  

#5  All these extreme protesting women have become unhinged or just look unhinged - maybe both.
Posted by: warthogswife   2017-02-06 10:57  

#4  The last thing a fish discovers is water.
Posted by: gorb   2017-02-06 10:44  

#3  It is such a pleasure to watch their house burning down like this. They really do not realize how weird they are.
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309   2017-02-06 01:38  

#2  Liberals.... so freaking gullible!
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-02-06 00:54  

#1  The UK edition of Marie Claire magazine used the occasion to incorrectly report that President Trump will "declare pre-marital sex" "wrong" via an executive order.

Uh, it IS wrong. That doesn't erase the fact that virtually every soul on the planet does it. But even this fake announcement attacks something that at its core is essentially correct.

The unhinged left has no real value for right and wrong.
Posted by: Crusader   2017-02-06 00:51  

00:00