You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Soros Fingerprints All Over Anti-Trump Lawsuits
2017-02-07
[LIFEZETTE] More than a dozen lawsuits and counting have been filed against President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
’s executive order that temporarily blocks visas from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Somalia, and Yemen. Looking beyond the handful of emotional personal stories that are gaining the media’s sympathy, there is a more predictable political power dynamic at play. The lawsuits largely stem from organizations bankrolled by billionaire leftist George Soros
...the secretive Hungarian born Ernst Stavro Blofeld-like billionaire who seems to fund every horrible progressive organization you can think of...
and Democratic state attorneys general.

New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who has carried out a political vendetta against Trump, led 15 other state attorneys general in a joint statement condemning what they called an "unconstitutional, un-American and unlawful executive order." The Democratic AGs also said, "Religious liberty has been, and always will be, a bedrock principle of our country and no president can change that truth," a curious statement from the party that targeted the Little Sisters of the Poor.

Posted by:Fred

#4  Or failing that simply institute his extreme vetting pronto?

You assuming INS is not full of leftards
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-02-07 05:12  

#3  Let the mocking commence! Seriousky though, Prsident Trump needs to get his immigration agenda through. If the a-gs are blocking then can he pass any specialist legislation through congress?

Or failing that simply institute his extreme vetting pronto? The 90-day ban was to facilitate the transition to dxtreme vetting. Forget the transition just begin?
Posted by: anon1   2017-02-07 05:10  

#2  No, these are attorneys for the states, separate from the federal government. Trump can mock them for being the grandstanding publicity whores that they are, though.
Posted by: SteveS   2017-02-07 04:55  

#1  Can Trump sack these attorneys general and appoint less treasonous ones?
Posted by: anon1   2017-02-07 03:36  

00:00