| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Anti-Trump Reporter Gets Unwelcome Surprise |
| 2017-02-18 |
| [POWERLINEBLOG] April Ryan is a news hound for American Urban Radio Networks. Last week, after a tense exchange with White House aide Omarosa Manigault, she leveled several accusations. Ryan claimed that Manigault told her she was among a group of news hounds on whom the White House is keeping dossiers with negative information. She claimed that she felt "physically intimidated" by Manigault. She described Manigault’s behavior as threatening enough to be "Secret Serviceable," meaning that it warranted intervention by law enforcement officers. Manigault denied Ryan’s accusations. She called them "fake news." Now, Manigault says that a White House media employee recorded the encounter. According to Manigault, the recording backs up her contention that Ryan’s version is false. She says the tape shows that Ryan came into the White House press-staff area "hot," hurling insults at her: She came in with an attitude. For her to characterize me as the bully -- I’m so glad we have this tape. . .because it’s ’liar, liar, pants on fire." Ryan is not happy that the the White House has the tape. She complains that she was not aware that the exchange was being recorded and that she never consented to it. "This is freaking Nixonian," she adds. As the Washington Post notes, under District of Columbia law there was no requirement that Ryan consent to the recording. It is ludicrous, moreover, to find a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area where White House news hounds mingle with White House staffers. Indeed, portions of the encounter were overheard by, among others, Abby Phillip of the Washington Post and John Roberts of Fox News. (Neither has corroborated Ryan’s claims, with Roberts denying that the event rose to the level of a "confrontation" and saying he did not hear the word "dossier.") The taping of a public disagreement is not in any sense Nixonian. If there’s a "Nixon" in this scenario, it is Ryan -- if, in fact, a tape exposes her as dishonest. During the campaign, there were reports that Ryan was taking money from the Clinton campaign to provide favorable coverage. Manigault, formerly Ryan’s friend (according to the Post), emailed her about this allegation. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #10 My opinion of reporters is one step below child molesters. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2017-02-18 22:44 |
| #9 Body cams for everybody. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2017-02-18 17:40 |
| #8 I have little sympathy for any problems the MSM has brought on themselves. My feelings for them are somewhere south of most repulsive things you might think of. Most should have to give up their 1st Amendment protections since they have abdicated any sense of being reporters. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2017-02-18 16:06 |
| #7 Not merely the government: Everyone should always make their own recording of any dealings with the media. |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2017-02-18 15:02 |
| #6 The government policy should be that the Gov record a version of every interaction with the media. Let it be known and the editing games will slow down if not stop. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2017-02-18 11:46 |
| #5 Anti-Trump Reporter Isn't this a tautology? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-02-18 11:16 |
| #4 Welcome to the swamp! Watch out for the alligators. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2017-02-18 11:09 |
| #3 April, sweetie, lemme explain this to youse: everything is recorded today. There are smartphones, cameras, voice recorders everywhere. Everybody's got one, and everybody knows how to use them. So now you're upset because someone did to you what you ordinarily do to them? Welcome to Washington. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2017-02-18 10:31 |
| #2 I hear that 'beat downs' are coming back into vogue. |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2017-02-18 01:35 |
| #1 Let's see... vindictive, dishonest, makes stuff up, and is outraged when exposed. Yep, she's a |
| Posted by: PBMcL 2017-02-18 01:20 |