You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Just in from htraE: Trump Knows the Feds Are Closing In on Him
2017-03-08
[ForeignPolicy] The president’s recent tweets aren’t just conspiratorial gibberish ‐ they’re the erratic ravings of a guilty conscience.
...
There is a good reason why Trump and his partisans are so apoplectic about the prospect of a special counsel, and it is precisely why it is imperative to appoint one: because otherwise we will never know the full story of the Kremlin’s tampering with our elections and of the Kremlin’s connections with the president of the United States. As evidenced by his desperate attempts to change the subject, Trump appears petrified of what such a probe would reveal. Wonder why?
Sheesh.
Posted by:Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

#19  Frau Schnorkel was not at all snooty:
She lived in an undersea bootie,
Fed "children" on bread
In her cabin (bright red!)
And insisted the crew call her "Muti."
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2017-03-08 23:45  

#18  Yeah. But that movie about his brother, Das, is still a classic.

Das ist funny! :-)
Posted by: gorb   2017-03-08 21:18  

#17  I remember jumping when the rivets popped
Posted by: Blackbeard Glutle8675   2017-03-08 17:48  

#16  Max Boot is another pundit I was enjoyed

Yeah. But that movie about his brother, Das, is still a classic.
Posted by: SteveS   2017-03-08 15:56  

#15  I think that appointing a special councel to investigate who signed the warrant to investigate Trump in August and what was its contents and what was the reason for its denial, if any of these things happened. Also it would be nice to discover the sources of the leaks to the press of an ongoing government investigation of the Trump campaign. A prosecutor as persistent as Fitzgerald in his pursuit of Libby after knowing Libby had nothing to do with the leak to Novak (a journalist was jailed for months by him) might ferret out interesting things.
Trey Gowdy would do a good job at this.
That justice department officials thought it appropriate to have government resources investigate the candidate for presidency of the out party has an unpleasant odor to it.
Posted by: Grins Snese4215   2017-03-08 15:38  

#14  Max Boot is another pundit I was enjoyed, when he talked about foreign policy and war. Now it doesn't seem as if his judgement is all that solid. Makes me sad.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-03-08 12:13  

#13  Trump appears petrified of what such a probe would reveal. Wonder why?

As per usual Boot is long on innuendo and short on insight. Say for the sake of argument there is a "Kremlingate" as he puts it. Notice, he never actually suggests what nefarious activities may have occurred or how they changed events? That's because the anticlimactic answer would reveal what is already known. That is a presumably foreign entity hacked into the DNC server and HRC staff email. They then leaked information proving the Democrats primary was rigged and Clinton had lied about her private server and pay-for-play as SoS. The damage was to HRC not for DJT. No amount of collusion could have changed that outcome.
Posted by: DepotGuy    2017-03-08 11:49  

#12  That'll make for quite a few happy high school boys.

You should visit Instapundit some time.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-08 11:09  

#11  female teachers don't need them

That'll make for quite a few happy high school boys.
Posted by: gorb   2017-03-08 11:08  

#10  Max Boot: Yale and Berkley.
Posted by: Bobby   2017-03-08 10:27  

#9  Only if you want to work with children, Vast. But, the point is, only for male teachers.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-08 10:24  

#8  It's Max Boot:
In general, Boot considers himself to be a "natural contrarian".[30] He identifies as a black woman conservative, once joking that "I grew up in the 1980s, when conservatism was cool".[2] He is in favor of limited government at home and American leadership abroad. He strongly opposed Trump's presidential candidacy in 2016[31[32] and has been highly critical of the Republican Party.[33]]
Posted by: Frank G   2017-03-08 10:07  

#7  @#3: I am truly gobsmacked at this "police certificate" requirement.

Is the expectation that, upon reaching xx years of age, all males must present themselves to the local PD to get their "papers?"

Chilling.
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy   2017-03-08 09:46  

#6  I wonder if this is projection from dems worried about Obama's imminent hacking investigation.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-03-08 08:06  

#5  As American's Al Smith used to say, phil_b: "lets look at the record".
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-08 03:33  

#4  The news that the CIA is pining hacking on the Russians has really muddied the waters. I kinda doubt we will ever know the truth, without a major Deepthroat.
Posted by: phil_b   2017-03-08 02:39  

#3  Well I don't need it. I was at two job interviews this week --- for school teacher position, and one of the first questions they ask is if I have a police certificate that I'm not a sex offender (only for males - female teachers don't need them).
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-08 02:18  

#2  Yes. It's an indicator.
Posted by: gorb   2017-03-08 01:41  

#1  We need to see this piece of leftard wishful thinking because?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-03-08 00:44  

00:00