| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Colonel Mustard's Revenge: What Was Done to Undermine Trump |
| 2017-03-10 |
| BLUF: [PJ] In any case, under this assumption, we must therefore infer that after the election, the Obama administration was not only using national security resources to intercept the communications of the president-elect and his team, but were then using selective leaks to cooperative press outlets to damage that incoming administration. Oh, and also committing federal felonies in the process. Or, (2) in fact all those leaks about wiretaps were lies, planted by members of the Obama administration with cooperative press outlets, in order to damage the Trump administration. Given the recent outright denials on the record by the ex-DNI and others, maybe that's the more likely explanation -- in which case, we know that members of the Obama administration were perfectly happy to lie to damage their successors, no matter the consequences. In either case, however, given the number of open stories about how Trump's insiders were being tapped before Trump complained about it, the assertion that there is no evidence behind Trump's tweet is transparent nonsense. And the evidence against Colonel Mustard is piling up. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #1 It's a good thing all these 27-year old journalists living in the echo chamber can't read. Or think. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2017-03-10 17:01 |