| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Montana Democrats Vote Against Bill Banning Sharia Law, Call It ‘Repugnant' |
| 2017-04-01 |
| [Breitbart] Democrats in Montana have opposed a bill banning the use of foreign law in its state courts on the grounds that such legislation would target Muslims. Senate Bill 97, introduced by Keith Regier (R-Kalispell) bans the application of foreign law in Montana’s courts, with the debate particularly focused on Sharia Law, a form of Islamic law typically used in the Middle East. Although the bill passed on party lines by 56-44, Democrats claimed it was designed to target Muslim communities. "I think it sends a dangerous message to minority groups both here living in our state and wanting to come visit our state, just merely on the fact that you may be different," said Rep. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula, while debating the bill. "I truly believe this law is repugnant. I believe this is not who we are as Montanans." |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #12 With hands that've never held helves, They'll shovel sharia by shelves, Then shout, as they light it, "You fascists should fight it! We would, but we're too tired, ourselves." |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2017-04-01 23:51 |
| #11 Did a comment of mine in this thread get removed? |
| Posted by: Crusader 2017-04-01 23:39 |
| #10 WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THE incredible blindness? |
| Posted by: Skidmark 2017-04-01 21:58 |
| #9 They somehow think they will escape the slaughter and that Islam will suddenly welcome the homosexuals and trannies with open arms. Open knives maybe... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2017-04-01 17:42 |
| #8 #2Â Â What do they think about Branch Davidian Law? After the Waco siege, I got a good idea what they think of that. The count was a total of 76 people dead including cultists burned to death and the 4 government agents and 6 Davidians shot to death. This occurred during the 1st Clinton administration. The question is why do the Democrats have all this new-found liking for Sharia Law? Is it the "supremacy" aspects? Or the possibility of new recruits into the Donk Party? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2017-04-01 17:31 |
| #7 When the revolution comes in earnest, I look forward to those who voted against the *safety* of their own citizenry being placed against the wall. |
| Posted by: Crusader 2017-04-01 16:30 |
| #6 The main thing, it's passed. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-04-01 12:39 |
| #5 "I think it sends a dangerous message to minority groups both here living in our state and wanting to come visit our state, just merely on the fact that you may be different," said Rep. Shane Morigeau, D-Missoula, while debating the bill. "I truly believe this law is repugnant. I believe this is not who we are as Montanans." If you think that law is repugnant, wait until you get inundated with Muslims demanding your obedience to THEIR law. Then you'll find out what repugnant REALLY is. Idiot... |
| Posted by: Dave D. 2017-04-01 12:31 |
| #4 Just don't mention the 10 Commandments. |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2017-04-01 11:15 |
| #3 Don't forget the Napoleonic Code. |
| Posted by: Abu Uluque 2017-04-01 11:12 |
| #2 What do they think about Branch Davidian Law? Talmudic law? |
| Posted by: Bobby 2017-04-01 11:06 |
| #1 I believe the term you are looking for is 'Judas'. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-04-01 10:13 |