You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Syria 'Did Not and Will Not' Use Chemical Weapons, Says Muallem
2017-04-07
[An Nahar] Syria's armed forces "did not and will not" use chemical weapons, even against jihadist groups, Foreign Minister Walid Muallem said on Thursday.

"I stress to you once again: the Syrian army has not, did not and will not use this kind of weapons -- not just against our own people, but even against the forces of Evil that attack our civilians with their mortar rounds," he said.

Muallem spoke at a presser in Damascus two days after a suspected chemical attack left at least 86 people dead in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhun in northwestern Syria.

The deaths have sparked international outrage with many pointing the finger at the government of Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad
Terror of Aleppo ...
, but Muallem cast doubt on the evidence.

"The first air raid conducted by the Syrian army was at 11:30 am (0830 GMT) on that day (Tuesday) and it attacked an arms depot belonging to al-Nusra
...formally Jabhat an-Nusrah li-Ahli al-Sham (Support Front for the People of the Levant), also known as al-Qaeda in the Levant. They aim to establish a pan-Arab caliphate. Not the same one as the Islamic State, though .. ...
Front that contained chemical weapons," he said.

Al-Nusra -- now known as Fateh al-Sham
...formerly al-Nusra, the current false nose and mustache of al-Qaeda in the Levant...
Front -- was once al-Qaeda's Syria affiliate and is the main jihadist rival of the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
group.

"Al-Nusra Front and ISIS (IS) and other organizations continue to store chemical weapons in urban and residential areas," Muallem added.

The Syrian army denied on Tuesday that it had used chemical weapons against Khan Sheikhun, and Damascus ally Moscow said "toxic substances" may have been released when the army struck a "terrorist warehouse".

Posted by:Fred

#9  several sources of evidence now

- eyewitness reports of survivors who saw bombs released from airplanes

- eyewitness reports of explosions then symptoms

- some footage from drones and images from satellites

- we (or possibly Turkey or Israel) probably also have sources in the Syrian military

- intercept of some Syrian communications

not a 100% closed case but you rarely get that in this kind of conflict
Posted by: lord garth   2017-04-07 17:39  

#8  The false flag possibility is the one that really bugs me. I haven't particularly trusted civilian casualty reports since the Kuwaiti's admitted they lied about the Iraqis' tossing babies out of incubators and admitting later they would have said anything to get the US involved.

I just have to hope the US has better sources these days and Matthis wouldn't have gone off half-cocked without stronger evidence than media reports and the rebel's word for it.

I just wish I trusted our overly-politicized Intelligence services a bit more these days.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-04-07 16:53  

#7  Al Nusra & ISIL funded by U S State Dept under Hill & Kerry so Muallem is probably telling to truth.
Posted by: Sonny Darling of the Platypi5488   2017-04-07 16:37  

#6  I will note, however, it sends Kimmmy a message that is clear. See - Grenada.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-04-07 09:25  

#5  Remember the starving children in Somalia, that lead to Blackhawk Down (and a retreat after we had taken out most of the warlord's manpower). Never let the press set the agenda.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-04-07 09:24  

#4  Appears to be a knee-jerk reaction to media fotos of dead children. Sorry, but I see no good coming from any of it.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-04-07 06:34  

#3  Yep, I don't think it was Assad as he's winning the war.

Which is why the MSM are shaping things as he opposite.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2017-04-07 03:59  

#2  It wouldn't surprise me if the Turks were behind this.

Or Iran - Assad been making independence noises lately.

Or Besoeker's Klingons (not implying you own them, ou rooinek, but you did coin the term).

Or Russians - they are chess players.

But, the most likely explanation, bombing hit "rebels'" storage.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-04-07 02:15  

#1  It wouldn't surprise me if the Turks were behind this.
Posted by: phil_b   2017-04-07 00:29  

00:00