You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
REPORT: John Brennan Colluded With Foreign Spies to Falsify Trump-Russia Connections
2017-04-20
[GatewayPundit] In a damning report originally stemming from the Guardian, and then picked up by the American Spectator, it has been confirmed that former CIA director John Brennan colluded with British and Estonian spies who sought to both to manufacture Trump-Russia ties and bring down Trump’s candidacy as a whole. Via The American Spectator:

Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy. He used their phony intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people.

John Brennan’s CIA operated like a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage on Trump. An official in the intelligence community tells TAS that Brennan’s retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their activism, decorating offices with "Hillary for president cups" and other campaign paraphernalia.

The Guardian says that British spy head Robert Hannigan "passed material in summer 2016 to the CIA chief, John Brennan." To ensure that these flaky tips leaked out, Brennan disseminated them on Capitol Hill. In August and September of 2016, he gave briefings to the "Gang of Eight" about them, which then turned up on the front page of the New York Times.
[…]
Were the media not so completely in the tank for Obama and Hillary, all of this political mischief would make for a compelling 2016 version of All the President’s Men. Instead, the public gets a steady stream of Orwellian propaganda about the sudden propriety of political espionage. The headline writers at Pravda couldn’t improve on this week’s official lie, tweeted out by the Maggie Habermans: "Susan Rice Did Nothing Wrong, Say Both Dem and Republican House Aides."

Wow...just wow.
Brennan and Soetoro were doing everything in their power to ensure a Clinton win. It simply wasn't enough.
Posted by:Varmint Cheremp8816

#6  Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy.

So he made a calculated political decision instead of sticking with the facts. Just the kind of guy I want in that position.

Also, we can thank 0bumhole for being immature enough to politicize the position.
Posted by: gorb   2017-04-20 14:40  

#5  I am convinced that ValJar is somewhere in this chain of events and passage of information. Equally troubling is the recent meeting in Fiji (?)on Geffen's super yacht (454 ft) of Oprah, Geffen, Tom Hanks and the Obama's, as the next presidential candidacy is contemplated to further the Obama era through Oprah as a surrogate? I laughed when I learned of it, but the more I thought about how the Media/Hollywood/MoveOn.org/Soros complex is stirring things up, the more it seemed possible?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2017-04-20 13:18  

#4  Trial?
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-04-20 13:14  

#3  It is going to be one hell of a trial.
Posted by: David169   2017-04-20 12:49  

#2  No matter how they tried the psychopathy showed. Most people probably didn't know what it was or even think about it very much. But there is a subtle, general, creepy feeling you get from Hillary that she has the personality of a reptile.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-04-20 12:17  

#1  John Brennan was the American progenitor of political espionage aimed at defeating Donald Trump. One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election — Hillary’s.

Brennan is a snake. Despite his snakiness, Hillary still lost. Why? Because she sucked as a candidate and a decent human bean.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-04-20 08:58  

00:00