Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
A North Korean Nuclear EMP Attack? … Unlikely |
2017-05-10 |
[38North.org] Size Matters Therein lies my insignificance. This is an instance where size does matter: the larger the nuclear explosion, the larger the affected area. While technical reports and papers on EMP from nuclear detonations are mostly classified, there is a paper by D. Hafemeister of California Polytechnic Institute that provides sufficient detail to derive a simple rule of thumb on the relationship between affected distance and nuclear device yield. The paper makes some simplifying assumptions: ![]()
Plugging in the numbers and presuming these assumptions are appropriate, the rule of thumb is surprisingly simple: D = Y, where D is the maximum damage distance expressed in kilometers and Y is the yield of the blast in kilotons. So, a 20 KT bomb detonated at optimum height would have a maximum EMP damage distance of 20 km; a 1 MT (1,000 KT) bomb would damage out to 1,000 km. The largest North Korean test to date has been estimated to be about 20 KT. Conclusions Considering the physics behind EMP and the status of North Korea’s nuclear program to date, doomsday headlines in the press regarding the North’s potential EMP threat are grossly overstated.[4] North Korea’s nuclear tests have not yet demonstrated sufficient yield to cause damage to large areas through EMP. Moreover, with only a limited arsenal, it would not make sense for the North Koreans to conduct nuclear tests simply to develop EMP weapons. Dunno. |
Posted by:Blossom Unains5562 |
#10 Underwater nuke at the entrance to Puget Sound, and the tsunami would create one hell of a mess. |
Posted by: phil_b 2017-05-10 19:36 |
#9 Absolutely right, Magpie. Prepositioned atomics in the bay at Busan, home of the ROK navy and US Navy command can compromise a US carrier group, the ROK Navy, poison South Korea's second largest city and will severely impede deployment and resupply logistics for the US Forces SK. Seoul is the imagined strategic first strike but it can be taken out with artillery. The gateway to the world port of Busan feeds and defends the nation. ![]() |
Posted by: Skidmark 2017-05-10 15:44 |
#8 Detonation in a seaport, probably underwater to kick up the most radioactive crud, on the Pacific coast scares me a Lot more than the EMP-Godzilla that keeps returning from oblivion every few years. |
Posted by: magpie 2017-05-10 15:01 |
#7 @#3: Nice pic. You are totally doable. |
Posted by: Spike Elmoth6259 2017-05-10 14:03 |
#6 "Hacking" into our infrastructure with Chinese assistance is more of a real threat than this. Its easier, quiet, deniable, cheaper and gets the job done. |
Posted by: Yosemite Sam 2017-05-10 10:12 |
#5 Miniaturization is the key. Our nuclear capable Samsung Galaxy S8+ app could take out an entire first floor Nordstrom's men's section and neighboring Starbucks. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-05-10 09:20 |
#4 More likely an "unsourced"ground level bomb will destroy a city somewhere, maybe even Beijing. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2017-05-10 09:07 |
#3 |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-05-10 09:06 |
#2 But Fake News sells! |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2017-05-10 08:57 |
#1 See Starfish Prime blast for EMP effects |
Posted by: Skidmark 2017-05-10 01:57 |