You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
State officials fume after leak shows how feds planned to use armed troops
2017-07-24
Follow up to this from a few days ago.
[WASHINGTONEXAMINER] An organization representing top state election officials is complaining it's being kept in the dark by the federal government after a new report showed the B.O. regime was quietly making extensive plans -- including the possibility of deploying armed troops -- in the case of an election day cyberattack or last-minute propaganda efforts from Russia.

Time Magazine reported on a document it obtained showing the administration's plans, which noted that state and local governments would have the primary jurisdiction, but called for the deployment of armed troops to counter a "significant incident."

The plan allowed for the deployment of "armed federal law enforcement agents" to polling places if hackers managed to halt voting. It also foresaw the deployment of "Active and Reserve" military forces and members of the National Guard "upon a request from a federal agency and the direction of the Secretary of Defense or the President."

The National Association of Secretaries of State, a nonpartisan group that encourages cooperation and information sharing between the top voting officials of the states, said they had no idea the administration was making such plans, which shows a continued lack of communication.

"Time and time again, state election officials who hold the constitutional authority to oversee the voting process have been left wondering why our federal leaders are being so opaque about their plans to help secure elections from foreign nation-state threats," said Kay Stimson, spokesperson for NASS.

"There won't be unlimited chances to get this right," Stimson added. "The feds don't even have authority to act without the consent of state and local officials. What is the point of gathering intelligence on foreign threats, only to withhold that information from the very people who can use it to bolster the defenses around our election systems?"
Posted by:Fred

#9  #6 TWWhat was the unintended consequence, JohnQC?

That Americans might revolt against such an overreach.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-07-24 11:19  

#8  The plan...It also foresaw the deployment of "Active and Reserve" military forces and members of the National Guard "upon a request from a federal agency and the direction of the Secretary of Defense or the President."

A Federal instrument for the 'whimsical' deployment of soldiers domestically, without the controls of declaring martial law, is now available for public inspection. Pretty scary.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-07-24 10:53  

#7  ...you mean sort of like the people pursuing to bring down a constitutionally elected president not understanding that they might ignite a civil war that brings them all down?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-07-24 10:42  

#6  It was viewed as an end-around to make it easier to rig elections. These statists don't ever seem to catch on to the notion of unintended consequences

What was the unintended consequence, JohnQC?
Posted by: trailing wife   2017-07-24 09:59  

#5  The plan allowed for the deployment of "armed Black Panthers federal law enforcement agents" to polling places
Posted by: Frank G   2017-07-24 09:12  

#4  the B.O. regime was quietly making extensive plans -- including the possibility of deploying armed troops -- in the case of an election day cyberattack or last-minute propaganda efforts from Russia.

Jeh Johnson alluded to Federalization of voting in the 2016 election. There was considerable pushback to the idea. It was viewed as an end-around to make it easier to rig elections. These statists don't ever seem to catch on to the notion of unintended consequences. IMHO, it would have been a grave mistake to attempt to deploy agents/troops.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-07-24 08:47  

#3  AH WOW!!. That was good.
Posted by: Dale   2017-07-24 08:10  

#2  To paraphrase Euripides 2400 years ago: In a nation of barbarians, there can be only one truly free person.
To paraphrase George Carlin: And that one person ain't you!
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-07-24 04:13  

#1  The point is to rule you like a king, peasants. The feds are supreme and have big guns, and state and local officials can fuck right off.
Posted by: Crinetle Glusosh3466   2017-07-24 03:38  

00:00