Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
It Wasn't Comey's Decision to Exonerate Hillary – It Was Obama's |
2017-09-03 |
![]() On the right, the commentariat is in full-throttle outrage over the revelation that former FBI Director Comey began drafting his statement exonerating Hillary Clinton in April 2016 ‐ more than two months before he delivered the statement at his now famous July 5 press conference. The news appears in a letter written to new FBI Director Christopher Wray by two senior Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans, Chairman Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham. Pundits and the Trump administration are shrieking because this indicates the decision to give the Democrats’ nominee a pass was clearly made long before the investigation was over, and even long before key witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#3 With the time Soetoro had left on the clock, he only had two choices: 1. Do nothing and permit the investigation take it's course to an indictment and be blamed for her demise as well as have his dique rubbed in the dirt. 2. End the investigation using his FBI Director and her old friend, confidant, and bag man James Comey. My guess is (and only a guess), Soetoro used Slick Willie and events at Sky Harbor Airport as a convenient cutout. Under (very improbable) testimony, Soetoro could correctly say 'he never discussed the Clinton issue with Lynch.' He chose door #2. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-09-03 15:25 |
#2 Soetoro didn't want that FBI/DoJ email decoder ring to discover his own clandestine communications, and still doesn't. You take a look at the Beest's 30,000 (+ or -) email, you're likely find a whole host of surprises. Comey was too cock sure of himself not to have been 'backstopped.' Just my take on that evil bastid. One set of rules for them, one set for us. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-09-03 15:06 |
#1 Ah, the National Review. Whose side are they on? |
Posted by: Pappy 2017-09-03 13:28 |