Submit your comments on this article |
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather- |
Climate scientists: Previous warming estimates were ‘on the hot side' |
2017-09-20 |
The study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, makes clear that rapid reductions in emissions will still be required but suggests that the world has more time to make the changes. |
Posted by:DarthVader |
#10 "We need Grants to provide more accurate hysterical predictions" |
Posted by: Frank G 2017-09-20 19:38 |
#9 It's better than we thought! |
Posted by: Shipman 2017-09-20 18:57 |
#8 Overpopulation. Disease. Starvation. Resource Depletion. Global The same people always have the same solution: World Socialism...As if it would every be anything but an Oligarchy. |
Posted by: magpie 2017-09-20 15:59 |
#7 Global Cooling predicted needs global tax in 5,4,3,2,1 |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2017-09-20 11:07 |
#6 They are still wrong and always will be. When they die I'll bet the devil gets tired of their shrill screaming that brimstone will lead to |
Posted by: Silentbrick 2017-09-20 09:36 |
#5 Bobby, I see what you did there. lol 8^) |
Posted by: AlanC 2017-09-20 08:40 |
#4 How .. unsettling! |
Posted by: Bobby 2017-09-20 08:36 |
#3 That was true when scientists were odd-balls on the fringes of society, SteveS. Nowadays, people who get into tenure track science positions are well socially adjusted, group dynamics alpha, wheeler dealers. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-09-20 05:56 |
#2 The value of a scientific theory or model lies in it's ability to make predictions, not in it's explanations. If your predictions suck, so does your theory. It's as simple as that. |
Posted by: SteveS 2017-09-20 01:14 |
#1 Aka... wrong as fuck and people are starting to notice. Back peddle... |
Posted by: DarthVader 2017-09-20 00:38 |