You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Lena Dunham could take over as Glamour mag editor
2017-10-15
Lena Dunham is reportedly in talks to take over as the next editor in chief of Glamour magazine.
Because she's so glam...
Dunham, the star, writer, and creator of the HBO hit series Girls, is said to be a candidate to take over at the glossy magazine published by Conde Naste, WWD reported on Friday.

Glamour is searching for a replacement for Cindi Leive, who departed her position as editor in chief last month after 16 years.

Leive left her post the same week as three other big names in the world of magazine publishing stepped down – Graydon Carter of Vanity Fair; Roberta Myers of Elle; and Nancy Gibbs of Time.

'I’m leaving the brand in great shape,' Leive told The New York Times last month.

Leive is credited with leading the magazine into the digital age.
Glamour.com draws 11 million monthly unique visitors. The magazine also has 15 million followers across various social media platforms.
More at the link
Posted by:badanov

#9  They could change the name to Buffarillo or Garboon also...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2017-10-15 19:17  

#8  Changing its name to "Hambeast" will only be the beginning.
Posted by: charger   2017-10-15 15:01  

#7  Huh? What's this Glamour Magazine? Never heard of it.
Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance   2017-10-15 09:54  

#6  "Photo Spread" takes on a horrible new meaning
Posted by: Frank G   2017-10-15 09:52  

#5  Excellent! Another job she's utterly incapable of doing!
Posted by: ed in texas   2017-10-15 09:08  

#4  Nothing says Glamour like eating cake on a toilet.
Posted by: Glaviting Slamble7902   2017-10-15 08:56  

#3  What’s next... Chelsea Manning taking over Playboy.
Posted by: Airandee   2017-10-15 07:41  

#2  What could go wrong?/sarc

Has the print industry so hit the wall that short half-life gimmicks are an acceptable substitute for journalism?
Posted by: Anomalous Sources   2017-10-15 01:23  

#1  More at the link

Thanks for the warning.
Posted by: gorb   2017-10-15 00:40  

00:00