You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Trump exceeded authority with travel ban, says court
2017-12-25
More on this story from yesterday.
[DAWN] HONOLULU: A US federal appeals court panel ruled that President Donald Trump
...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States...
once again exceeded the scope of his authority with his latest travel ban, but the judges on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals put their decision on hold pending review by the US Supreme Court, meaning the ban involving six majority Moslem countries will remain in effect.

The 77-page ruling released late Friday says Trump’s proclamation makes no finding whatsoever that simply being from one of the countries cited in the ban makes someone a security risk.

Hawaii, which is suing to stop the ban, has argued that it will be harmful because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered.

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court lifted temporary lower court orders that had prevented the latest ban from taking effect.

The status quo was maintained when the 9th Circuit stayed its decision, said Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.

The ruling was unusual, but it’s a unique case, he said, noting the Supreme Court has not set argument dates because it has not yet decided to grant an appeal.

"Given the shockingly rapid volley of executive actions and court decisions, this is surely just the latest in a long series of battles to come."

Mary Fan, a University of Washington law school professor, said about immigration ban litigation.

The judges focused on whether Trump had made a required finding that the entry of people affected by the ban would be detrimental to US interests.

Posted by:Fred

#11  ^^^ Because Leftism isn't rational. I do like the 3 strikes you're out, but let's up the ante a bit. Three strikes and you go to the gallows.
Posted by: Herb Smith2864   2017-12-25 19:39  

#10  Because they want more foreign born muslims in their university instead of educating Hawaiians?
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-12-25 15:02  

#9  We really need a three strikes your out policy. If your judicial opinion is overturned by the Supreme Court Three times you get disbarred and lose your judgeship. Some of these activists might start thinking twice to protect their phones Bologna jobs.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-12-25 13:32  

#8  Court Exceeds it Constitutional Authority

FIFY
Posted by: P2kontheroad   2017-12-25 13:21  

#7  Guess what Hawaii? You gave up your ability to run your own foreign policy when you became a state. How anyone could find this suit having merit or standing is an exercise in leftist mind-twisting.
Posted by: Injun Bucket8891   2017-12-25 12:12  

#6  Hawaii, which is suing to stop the ban, has argued that it will be harmful because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered.

You do know that is how the scum that have launched the latest attacks got in, right?

We should drop all these idiot liberal fucks in Syria and let nature take its course.
Posted by: DarthVader   2017-12-25 10:05  

#5  because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered
This has nothing to do with the power of the POTUS to limit access of foreigners to the USA.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2017-12-25 08:12  

#4  OK, send them all to Hawaii.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-12-25 06:31  

#3  So, your state court has more Plenary Power than the Commander in Chief?

Do Say?!

This folder should be handled like HAZMAT all the way to the chain that breaks this down to that useless lower court like lava on steel.

Go run for office if you want "change", but that is not a Judges place.

I cannot count on you for anything now. New career for you is needed.
Posted by: newc   2017-12-25 03:01  

#2  The judges focused on whether Trump had made a required finding that the entry of people affected by the ban would be detrimental to US interests.

I'll bet they wake up every morning surprised to find their nose in the middle of their face every morning as well. That water is still wet, and Fire still burns....

And it seems Obama wielded that same 'authority'...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-12-25 00:54  

#1  Therefore Obama exceeded his authority when he established DACA.
Posted by: Ulaigum Ebbineng7056   2017-12-25 00:53  

00:00