You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Embattled FBI admits it can't verify dossier claims of Russia, Trump campaign collusion
2017-12-26
[Washington Times] The FBI is declining to repudiate the Russia dossier on which it partially relied to start an investigation into the Trump campaign, but it concedes the document’s major core charges of election collusion remain unsubstantiated.

Sources familiar with House and Senate investigations say this is the FBI’s dossier talking point 17 months after agents were first briefed in July 2016 as Donald Trump battled Hillary Clinton for the White House.

The most recent FBI witness was Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who spent nearly eight hours last week in a closed session before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Republicans believe they have unearthed a scandal inside the bureau’s top echelons over its determination to target Trump associates based on flimsy evidence and improper Justice Department contacts.

Republican committee members pressed Mr. McCabe about a dossier that was financed by the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign based on gossip-tinged information from paid, unidentified Kremlin operatives.

Mr. McCabe declined to criticize the dossier’s 35 pages of salacious and criminal charges against Donald Trump and his aides, but he said it remains largely unverified, according to a source familiar with ongoing congressional inquiries.
Posted by:Besoeker

#9  Why do I suspect they are waiting for someone to die of natural causes so that they can place blame on that person.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-12-26 20:52  

#8  Dossier: it's not not true, but it's not not not true.
Posted by: KBK   2017-12-26 17:09  

#7  Cancer inside the FBI
Posted by: P. Speaking for B.   2017-12-26 15:39  

#6  I think both sides are scrambling for cover stories to keep us from knowing the truth.

Why would POTUS and AG want to aid in the cover-up?
Posted by: P. Speaking for B.   2017-12-26 15:00  

#5  If the dossier was used as supporting evidence for a FISA warrant, someone must eventually own it. I suspect this is a very sticky wicket. There is the possibility that Soetoro provided the authorization for the use of the dossier.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-12-26 09:43  

#4  we're just not fully briefed on the individuals responsible

I think both sides are scrambling for cover stories to keep us from knowing the truth.
Posted by: Skidmark   2017-12-26 09:39  

#3  ...Remember what I said back when all this started - the Democrats expected that when it came out, Trump would go into a defensive crouch and spend all his time addressing what was in it, while Hilary would tut-tut and cruise to a secure win. And after January 20th, President Clinton would have made sure that the dossier was quietly burned/shredded/reduced to atoms.

Trouble is, 1) Trump didn't follow the script...hell, he ignored it, and 2) Hilary was still so disliked that she lost a rigged election. So now what you have is a situation where the Dems fired their 'secret weapon'...and (to use USAF Ammo terminology) it hung up on the rack, and there's no place to jettison it.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2017-12-26 09:08  

#2  Beso, coming clean would result in a severe shortage of cells in various correctional facilities........not that there's anything wrong with that mind you.
Posted by: AlanC   2017-12-26 08:52  

#1  Unable to verify it? Then why was it given to then President Soetoro and why was community wide distribution made on it? Let's be honest here, we all know what this was about, we're just not fully briefed on the individuals responsible.

Time to come clean and move on.
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-12-26 05:38  

00:00