Submit your comments on this article |
-Land of the Free |
Sheryl Attkisson: 10 times the intel community violated the trust of the American citizen |
2017-12-27 |
By that, I don’t mean people stealing money. I mean officials who are stealing our privacy ‐ using the tools of intelligence-gathering and law-enforcing, which are meant to protect Americans, to instead spy on them, to gather information that isn’t the government’s business (at least not without a court’s approval). And, in some instances, it appears, to punish or silence those with whom they disagree ‐ personal and political foes, in and out of government ‐ rather than to pursue and protect Americans from the country’s real enemies. Perhaps more alarming is the growing evidence that suggests some officials at all levels in intelligence and justice agencies are operating in a way that is clearly intended to serve their own political beliefs and interests ‐ not the public’s interests. And sometimes, it appears, they operate not just in direct defiance of their superiors but of the Congress, the courts and the very laws of the land as well. (Almost as disturbing, Congress, for its part, seems all too willing to allow all of this to take place, when it becomes known, rather than using its authority to stop the misfeasance, punish the miscreants who lie or stonewall, and protect their constituents.) This is not, in my view, a partisan political question. The evidence leading us to ask such a disturbing question indicates there are forces inside our intelligence agencies that are more persistent and powerful than any single political party or administration. They can usurp the intentions of the many fine intelligence officers serving our country. List follows: |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#8 DoJ Inspector General Horowitz and his team are digging. He appears to be a pretty straight shooter: National Security Inspector general says mishandling of sexual harassment complaints at Justice Department is a ‘systemic’ problem |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-12-27 15:42 |
#7 I think we can be sure of that and I suspect he knows far more than he's telling about the Soetoro-Clinton network. Mid-January should get interesting. From early December: Attorney General Jeff Sessions, FBI Spox and Office of DOJ Inspector General Release Statements |
Posted by: A. Omereck6265 2017-12-27 15:12 |
#6 I would think Donald would love to get that crap out on the table for everyone to see...and to use it to clean house in those agencies. I think we can be sure of that and I suspect he knows far more than he's telling about the Soetoro-Clinton network. |
Posted by: Anguter Peacock5149 2017-12-27 14:58 |
#5 Attkisson does a great job of being very PC in the beginning of the article to get a broader spectrum of readers and then about half way through the article, she goes full bore on the Obama administration politicalization and weaponization of the CIA, NSA, and FBI. I wonder how long the DoJ, FBI, and NSA can stonewall Congress. I would think Donald would love to get that crap out on the table for everyone to see...and to use it to clean house in those agencies. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2017-12-27 12:02 |
#4 The founding fathers (and behind every great man is a great wife rolling her eyes) feared a powerful federal government. They built protections (i.e. enumerated powers, bill of rights) into the US Constitution to limit abuses. They believed that states, being closer to the people, is where all powers not granted to the federal government belonged. Then the US Civil War happened and in its aftermath, the states could not be counted on to protect the rights of all of its citizens. Thus started the rise of a powerful central government culminating in what we have today. Federal power means control of where vast amounts of money are spent. Time to start rolling back Federal power. The Supreme Court can do it in a single stroke by closing the Commerce Clause loophole eliminating the legal bases for circumventing the enumerated powers structure of the US Constitution. That could be followed by a new amendment to the US Constitution which better defines regulating interstate commerce so as to prevent abuses by future Supreme Courts. |
Posted by: A. Omereck6265 2017-12-27 09:59 |
#3 with whom they disagree ‐ personal and political foes,.............Congress, for its part, seems all too willing to allow all of this to take place Connect the dots anyone? Bueller??? Learned behavior at the knee of J Edgar. Congress can be extorted with threats or bribed with information; you pay your money and make your choice. |
Posted by: AlanC 2017-12-27 08:57 |
#2 Notice how many times Abu Clapper was linked? |
Posted by: Frank G 2017-12-27 08:57 |
#1 10 times the 10 times out of thousands. Numbers quickly counting up like a rabid ferret on crack in an espresso bar. |
Posted by: Woodrow 2017-12-27 04:01 |