You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Russian tankers fueled North Korea via transfers at sea - sources
2017-12-30
[Reuters] LONDON/MOSCOW - Russian tankers have supplied fuel to North Korea on at least three occasions in recent months by transferring cargoes at sea, according to two senior Western European security sources, providing an economic lifeline to the secretive Communist state.
Not to be outdone this week by our other good friends the Chinese.
The sales of oil or oil products from Russia, the world’s second biggest oil exporter and a veto-wielding member of the United Nations Security Council, breach U.N. sanctions, the security sources said.

The transfers in October and November indicate that smuggling from Russia to North Korea has evolved to loading cargoes at sea since Reuters reported in September that North Korean ships were sailing directly from Russia to their homeland.

"Russian vessels have made ship-to-ship transfers of petrochemicals to North Korean vessels on several occasions this year in breach of sanctions," the first security source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Reuters.

A second source, who independently confirmed the existence of the Russian ship-to-ship fuel trade with North Korea, said there was no evidence of Russian state involvement in the latest transfers.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Maybe our adversaries want to see our latest tech and tactics?
Posted by: gorb   2017-12-30 21:40  

#5  Two can play the game - thus, the weapons for Ukraine.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2017-12-30 12:46  

#4  As Mike K. said, follow the money.

Sanctions on Russia!
Posted by: H. Jineng3062   2017-12-30 09:50  

#3  Russia/Soviet Union have used surrogate 'bad actors' and proxy conflicts to confound the west since the end of WWII. The effort simply continues.

"Never trust a Russian. Never trust an Arab."
~ anon
Posted by: Besoeker   2017-12-30 07:49  

#2  So why do they really do it? Fear of the Norks? Hoping it causes WW III? Hoping it doesn't? Humanitarian reasons?

Uncaring malice. I could easily believe that neither of those nations has made a conscious decision to support the Norks other than in the most vague way possible - but on the other hand, certain individuals in those countries have (in the best capitalist tradition) seen a need, are filling it, and as long as their masters get a proper cut, just don't care.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2017-12-30 07:45  

#1  I can't imagine this would be financially worth the risk.

So why do they really do it? Fear of the Norks? Hoping it causes WW III? Hoping it doesn't? Humanitarian reasons?
Posted by: gorb   2017-12-30 01:15  

00:00