| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Government | |
| A budget the likes of which the Pentagon has never seen | |
| 2018-02-11 | |
And next year it would rise to $716 billion. Together, the two-year deal provides what Defense Secretary Jim Mattis says is needed to pull the military out of a slump in combat readiness at a time of renewed focus on the stalemated conflict in Afghanistan and the threat of war on the Korean peninsula. The budget bill that President Donald Trump signed Friday includes huge spending increases for the military: The Pentagon will get $94 billion more this budget year than last -- a 15.5 percent jump. It's the biggest year-over-year windfall since the budget soared by 26.6 percent, from $345 billion in 2002 to $437 billion the year after, when the nation was fighting in Afghanistan, invading Iraq and expanding national defense after the 9/11 attacks. The extra money is not targeted at countering a new enemy or a singular threat like al-Qaida extremists or the former Soviet Union. Instead the infusion is being sold as a fix for a broader set of problems, including a deficit of training, a need for more hi-tech missile defenses, and the start of a complete recapitalization of the nuclear weapons arsenal. Every secretary of defense since 2011, when the Congress passed a law setting firm limits on military and domestic spending, has complained that spending caps set by the Budget Control Act were squeezing the military so hard that the number of ready-to-fight combat units was dwindling. Aging equipment was stacking up, troops were not getting enough training and the uncertain budget outlook was clouding America's future. "I cannot overstate the negative impact to our troops and families' morale from all this budget uncertainty," Mattis said just hours before the House and Senate approved the deal. | |
| Posted by:Skidmark |
| #4 What. Decreasing or well managed? |
| Posted by: ed in texas 2018-02-11 19:59 |
| #3 Don't starve the Military. Make it cheaper. There is plenty of crap you can cut to make up for it. |
| Posted by: newc 2018-02-11 19:09 |
| #2 You cut back seriously on commitments, particularly to first world nations, your operational costs will go down, making more moneys available for those nagging things like replacement parts, maintenance, training, training, etc. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2018-02-11 08:37 |
| #1 After 8 years of Obama - just be glad the legislators are exhibiting "common' sense. |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-02-11 04:14 |